Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Wired Considers Gravity Film vs Science Balance

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday March 04 2014, @01:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the Newton's-Apple dept.

tlezer writes:

"With seven Academy Awards, Gravity represents a unique opportunity for NASA PR. However, they have to balance 'a broad public interest in space and space exploration' with the many 'scientific errors made in the name of artistic license.' Wired examines the choices made by the filmmakers, and have supplemented their article with a respectful collection of tweets under the hashtag #RealGravity, including some stunning images."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Wired Considers Gravity Film vs Science Balance | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 15 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by aXis on Tuesday March 04 2014, @02:47AM

    by aXis (2908) on Tuesday March 04 2014, @02:47AM (#10407)

    The article might work but it's just click bait. There is nothing of value other than pointing out that the twitter posts exist.

    I dont use twitter so was hoping the posts might have been reproduced in the article.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Informative=3, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   5  

  • (Score: 2) by hubie on Tuesday March 04 2014, @03:10AM

    by hubie (1068) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 04 2014, @03:10AM (#10418) Journal

    I agree. The article summary almost had more in it than the Wired article.