Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by DeathMonkey

Well my call for predictions for QAnon and March 4 resulted in remarkably few predictions but here I am undeterred for the follow-up!

No violence so far so that's good. Things could change but it does appear unlikely.

A smallish group of QAnoners did show up at the Capitol to watch the Re-Inauguration of Trump but, alas, Biden is still President.

My prediction was pretty spot-on thankyouverymuch!

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 05 2021, @02:02PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) on Friday March 05 2021, @02:02PM (#1120329) Journal

    However, the claim that nobody was buying into the mar 4 thing was disproven because a bunch of people showed up to watch the Re-Inauguration.

    How big is a "smallish group" or a "smattering" (the actual term used by the reporter in your second link) again? Hint: it's not a "bunch of people" unless you have really low standards. This story is not improved by weasel-speak.

    And I think it's telling that the reporter only reported interviewing a couple of people. Sounds to me like QAnon was outnumbered by the usual protesters that show up in Washington DC and the reporter gave up the fight after he found a couple.

  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 05 2021, @05:15PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 05 2021, @05:15PM (#1120419) Journal

    My prediction was "very sparse" and "bunch" was just a quick way of saying there was a nonzero amount. If you want to insist on the very sparseness of the crowd I will enjoy the reinforcement about how right I was!