Scientists move closer to solving mystery of antikythera mechanism:
Researchers claim breakthrough in study of 2,000-year-old Antikythera mechanism[*], an astronomical calculator found in sea
[...] The hand-powered, 2,000-year-old device displayed the motion of the universe, predicting the movement of the five known planets, the phases of the moon and the solar and lunar eclipses. But quite how it achieved such impressive feats has proved fiendishly hard to untangle.
Now researchers at UCL[**] believe they have solved the mystery – at least in part – and have set about reconstructing the device, gearwheels and all, to test whether their proposal works. If they can build a replica with modern machinery, they aim to do the same with techniques from antiquity.
"We believe that our reconstruction fits all the evidence that scientists have gleaned from the extant remains to date," said Adam Wojcik, a materials scientist at UCL. While other scholars have made reconstructions in the past, the fact that two-thirds of the mechanism are missing has made it hard to know for sure how it worked.
The mechanism, often described as the world's first analogue computer, was found by sponge divers in 1901 amid a haul of treasures salvaged from a merchant ship that met with disaster off the Greek island of Antikythera. The ship is believed to have foundered in a storm in the first century BC as it passed between Crete and the Peloponnese en route to Rome from Asia Minor.
[...] Michael Wright, a former curator of mechanical engineering at the Science Museum in London, pieced together much of how the mechanism operated and built a working replica, but researchers have never had a complete understanding of how the device functioned. Their efforts have not been helped by the remnants surviving in 82 separate fragments, making the task of rebuilding it equivalent to solving a battered 3D puzzle that has most of its pieces missing.
Writing in the journal Scientific Reports, the UCL team describe how they drew on the work of Wright and others, and used inscriptions on the mechanism and a mathematical method described by the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides, to work out new gear arrangements that would move the planets and other bodies in the correct way. The solution allows nearly all of the mechanism's gearwheels to fit within a space only 25mm deep.
According to the team, the mechanism may have displayed the movement of the sun, moon and the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn on concentric rings. Because the device assumed that the sun and planets revolved around Earth, their paths were far more difficult to reproduce with gearwheels than if the sun was placed at the centre. Another change the scientists propose is a double-ended pointer they call a "Dragon Hand" that indicates when eclipses are due to happen.
[...] "Although metal is precious, and so would have been recycled, it is odd that nothing remotely similar has been found or dug up," Wojcik said. "If they had the tech to make the Antikythera mechanism, why did they not extend this tech to devising other machines, such as clocks?"
[*] Wikipedia entry.
[**] UCL: University College London.
Journal Reference:
Tony Freeth, David Higgon, Aris Dacanalis, et al. A Model of the Cosmos in the ancient Greek Antikythera Mechanism [open], Scientific Reports (DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84310-w)
Previously:
Evidence of a Lunar Calendar on the Antikythera Mechanism
Antikythera Shipwreck Yields Statue Pieces and Mystery Bronze Disc
Antikythera Discoveries Prove Luxury Cargo
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 13 2021, @06:28PM
Funny, I thought the exact opposite. Complex work can sometimes be produced by a single, genius-level individual. I know a couple of these folks. They make amazing solo engineers, and shitty CEOs, but damn that first prototype MVP is compelling. Put a second person in the /creative/ mix - not just discourse criticism exchange etc - and suddenly their visions have to align perfectly. Two functional visions that have a slightly different mechanism, built from the ends to meet in the middle, will fail to mesh.
Basically, for inventions/craft that are head and shoulders above contemporaries, the odds that two or more people will have no communications errors or omissions, that every interface will be agreed upon, and so on, are slim. And this beautiful device does not strike me as an example of design by committee!