Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday March 17 2021, @11:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the starting-over dept.

For the first time in years, someone is building a web browser from scratch:

For more than two decades, building a new web browser from scratch has been practically unheard of. But a small company called Ekioh has its reasons.

The Cambridge, U.K.-based company is developing a browser called Flow, and unlike the vast majority of browsers that have arrived in recent years, it's not based on Google's Chromium or Apple's WebKit open-source code. Instead, Flow is starting with a blank slate and building its own rendering engine. Its goal is to make web-based apps run smoothly even on cheap microcomputers such as the Raspberry Pi.

There's a reason companies don't do this anymore: Experts say building new browsers isn't worth the trouble when anyone can just modify the work that Apple and Google are doing. But if Flow succeeds, it could rethink the way we browse the web and open the door to cheaper gadgets. That at least seems like a goal worth pursuing.

"It's a huge task, but if you want something which is very small and very fast, you typically can't start with one of the other engines," says Stephen Reeder, Ekioh's commercial director.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Kilo110 on Wednesday March 17 2021, @01:08PM (3 children)

    by Kilo110 (2853) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 17 2021, @01:08PM (#1125326)

    They'd probably just buy them out.

    Having a super fast browser that's optimized for low-end devices would be a big deal for building market share in developing countries. Most devices in those areas are exactly that, low-end devices with limited storage and performance.

    It'd be a big leg up over the competition.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Wednesday March 17 2021, @01:25PM (1 child)

    by looorg (578) on Wednesday March 17 2021, @01:25PM (#1125330)

    I would think this is the case, if Apple/Google/Facebook etc notice that this product is taking off they'll just buy it. They are each already buying probably hundreds of companies a year -- some get merged into their product line and some just goes away. So the question is if they are just going to buy it to scrap it or if they'll buy it to use it. While in theory we would all like small and fast software it probably won't contain all their telemetry and spying features they need to satisfy their advertisers (ie their real customers).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 17 2021, @02:03PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 17 2021, @02:03PM (#1125352)

      I would guess FB might want to get this one, just as a shield against the other two.

      As much as I hate FB, I would prefer this end to either of the others getting it.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Wednesday March 17 2021, @02:15PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 17 2021, @02:15PM (#1125355) Journal

    They'd [google] probably just buy them [flow] out.

    A much more gooder strategy tragedy would be: Google could support them with a generous funding. For a while. Let them hire people and grow the organization. Pay to be the default search engine. Then pull the rug out. People leave because they must have income. Project collapses.

    --
    People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.