Legal questions linger as governments and companies keep pushing into space:
The Perseverance rover's landing on Mars is still fresh in people's memories, privately owned companies are ferrying people and supplies into orbit, and NASA continues to work on "the most powerful rocket" it has ever built. But as world governments and private enterprises continue to eye the skies for opportunities, a SXSW panel called "Who on Earth should govern Space" makes clear that the laws dealing with space aren't evolving as fast as the technology that gets us there.
"People like to think of space as the Wild Wild West — nothing out there, there's open frontier, we can do whatever we want," said Michelle Hanlon, president of For All Moonkind, a non-profit devoted to preserving mankind's cultural heritage in space. "Unfortunately or fortunately, that's not true at all."
Hanlon was referring to the Outer Space Treaty, which was developed in 1966 and ratified by over 60 countries in early 1967. Considering the treaty was put into effect a full two years before mankind landed on the moon, it's little surprise that the document is heavy on broad principles, but light on specifics. Among its greatest hits: outer space shall be free for exploration and use by all states; states should avoid harmful contamination of space; celestial bodies shall only be used for peaceful purposes; and, perhaps most importantly, the assertion that outer space isn't subject to claims of sovereignty by Earth-bound governments.
[...] There have been efforts to more fully codify a set of rules to govern the way we approach space, including most recently the Artemis Accords signed by the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, Luxembourg, Italy, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates in 2020. Ten countries are a start, but a slew of significant space-faring states — including China, India and Russia — have not bought into the largely US-brokered accord. It's hard to say exactly what (if anything) it will take for the international community to agree to a comprehensive set of guidelines for the use of outer space. But one thing is clear: With the technology to get us and keep us in space growing more advanced by the day, these are issues we can't afford to keep punting.
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Tuesday March 23 2021, @02:13AM (2 children)
That would be en extinction-scale rock. Not clear there'll be much left to take over after.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday March 23 2021, @06:55AM (1 child)
https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/ [ic.ac.uk]
Fun calculator to play with. I chose an iron meteorite, 500 meter diameter, striking the earth at 90 degrees (straight on), and hitting sedimentary rock. I haven't found an easy-to-use calculator to determine how many tons that would be.
Found one - it seems for 50 gigaton, my iron spherical meteor only need be about 900 inches diameter, or about 22 meters.
https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/cgi-bin/crater.cgi?dist=200&distanceUnits=1&diam=500&diameterUnits=1&pdens=&pdens_select=8000&vel=25&velocityUnits=1&theta=90&wdepth=&wdepthUnits=1&tdens=2500 [ic.ac.uk]
Fortunately, most meteors that do hit the earth are ice and/or rock, and they tend to break up before hitting the earth, and they seldom hit straight on.
“I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 24 2021, @02:03AM