Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday October 07 2014, @07:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the more-burger-flippers dept.

Carolyn Johnson reports in the Boston Globe that in recent years, the position of postdoctoral researcher has become less a stepping stone and more of a holding tank as postdocs are caught up in an all-but-invisible crisis, mired in a underclass as federal funding for research has leveled off, leaving the supply of well-trained scientists outstripping demand. “It’s sunk in that it’s by no means guaranteed — for anyone, really — that an academic position is possible,” says Gary McDowell, a 29-year old biologist doing his second postdoc. “There’s this huge labor force here to do the bench work, the grunt work of science. But then there’s nowhere for them to go; this massive pool of postdocs that accumulates and keeps growing.” The problem is that any researcher running a lab today is training far more people than there will ever be labs to run. Often these supremely well-educated trainees are simply cheap laborers, not learning skills for the careers where they are more likely to find jobs. This wasn’t such an issue decades ago, but universities have expanded the number of PhD students they train from about 30,000 biomedical graduate students in 1979 to 56,800 in 2009, flooding the system with trainees and drawing out the training period.

Possible solutions span a wide gamut, from halving the number of postdocs over time, to creating a new tier of staff scientists that would be better paid but one thing people seem to agree on is that simply adding more money to the pot will not by itself solve the oversupply. Facing these stark statistics, postdocs are taking matters into their own hands recently organizing a Future of Research conference in Boston that they hoped would give voice to their frustrations and hopes and help shape change. “How can we, as the next generation, run the system?” said Kristin Krukenberg, 34, a lead organizer of the conference and a biologist in her sixth year as a postdoc at Harvard Medical School after six years in graduate school. “Some of the models we see don’t seem tenable in the long run."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday October 07 2014, @09:57PM

    by VLM (445) on Tuesday October 07 2014, @09:57PM (#103340)

    "on a salary which is OK but certainly nothing particularly stellar"

    Dude.... its usually like $30K in expensive areas where houses cost $750K+ for example and rent is like $2K/mo for a small apartment. And its $30K in 2014 when I was getting $33K in 1995 before I finished my BS degree, for guys with PHDs and published research.

    Its not "nothing stellar" its literally like working at McDonalds but with better benefits and better working conditions.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by boristhespider on Tuesday October 07 2014, @10:15PM

    by boristhespider (4048) on Tuesday October 07 2014, @10:15PM (#103349)

    I'm talking from a European perspective, where the salaries are normally above national average, if not by much. Though postdocs I looked at in the States something like eight years back were paying $50k+ - again, not a huge salary but at least a step up from #30k. Which of course might reflect the relative level of money available in theory at that time.