Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Monday March 29 2021, @10:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-watches-the-watchers? dept.

Consent to being surveilled or risk getting fired, says Amazon

Remember the AI cameras Amazon said it was going to install in its delivery vans to, erm, monitor their driving behaviour? The company is now deploying them and has asked tens of thousands of its employees to consent to being biometrically surveilled.

The e-commerce giant, however, isn't really giving them much of a choice. They have to agree or they can't drive the vans at all. In short, they have to suck it up or they lose their jobs. Referring to its AI-powered cameras, Amazon said: "This technology may create Biometric Information, and collect, store, and use Biometric Information from such photographs," Vice reported.

The drivers also have to agree to Amazon potentially storing the data for up to 30 days after it was collected. Some have refused and given up their jobs. The cameras developed by Netradyne are running machine learning software to detect 16 different types of behaviour, including everything from failing to brake at a stop sign, or speeding, to not wearing a seat belt or if the camera is obstructed.

See also: Amazon ditching plans to monitor delivery drivers for mask wearing

Amazon has dropped plans to use in-vehicle cameras to record which delivery service provider (DSP) drivers are wearing masks. [...] Amazon plans to use the in-vehicle cameras to monitor safe driving behaviors, including distracted driving. In a recent training video, however, the company added mask wearing as one of the behaviors it would monitor, The Information reported.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30 2021, @03:57PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 30 2021, @03:57PM (#1131242)

    .....I don't do things that are bad if I'm driving while representing someone (as in family or a company or others), so i would have no issues i'm sure.

    If you rephrased that as "I usually don't do things that are bad", I would have believed you. The thing is that no-one is performing at 100% for 100% of the time. We all have down days. And that's where this thing bites you: on your down day, some moron cuts you off and you yell at them and shake your first. The AI flags that as aggressive driving and you get called in by your manager to have "a little chat" that turns into "we are treating you like kids and so I'll have to 'write you up' for this".

    The thing is, these things have no context, they have no intelligence; they just match patterns and then use that against you. Show me where this type of tech is used in favor/defense of an employee as opposed to the company and then we'll talk again.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1