Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday April 03 2021, @05:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the neither-here-nor-there dept.

Quantum Motion unveils 9-second silicon qubit

Quantum Motion, a four-year-old UK-based startup is today announcing a quantum computing breakthrough, demonstrating that a stable qubit can be created on a standard silicon chip, similar to those used in smartphones.

[...] Even chipmaker Intel, which is testing a similar silicon-based approach in collaboration with Delft-based startup QuTech, talks about times of 1 second — and this is several orders of magnitude longer than what has been achieved by quantum companies using the superconducting approach.

[...] But more importantly, if the silicon approach works, the quantum computer industry would not have to build a new set of chip foundries — they could use the infrastructure that is already there. It would also be easier to combine quantum and classic computers if both use the same silicon chip and transistor architecture.

[...] Some of the quantum computing technologies may also be quite bulky when you scale up to multiple thousands of qubits. But in theory, a million of Quantum Motion's electron-spin qubits could be packed onto a 1cm square chip. You would still need the elaborate chandelier-like refrigerator to keep the chips at a fraction of a kelvin above absolute zero, but just one such refrigerator — similar in size to a server rack — can hold many chips.

Press release.

Also at TechRadar.

Journal Reference:
Virginia N. Ciriano-Tejel, Michael A. Fogarty, Simon Schaal, et al. Spin Readout of a CMOS Quantum Dot by Gate Reflectometry and Spin-Dependent Tunneling [open], PRX Quantum (DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010353)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 03 2021, @10:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 03 2021, @10:00PM (#1132974)

    Precisely controlled coupling is necessary, but switching is not,

    You could build a quantum computer pre-wired for a specific problem.

    The time to design, fab, and run might still be shorter than on normal logic.

    I'm waiting to see a machine that can factor 15=3*5, then one that can do 35=5*7, then 77= 7*11, etc.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Redundant=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0