Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday April 03 2021, @05:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the neither-here-nor-there dept.

Quantum Motion unveils 9-second silicon qubit

Quantum Motion, a four-year-old UK-based startup is today announcing a quantum computing breakthrough, demonstrating that a stable qubit can be created on a standard silicon chip, similar to those used in smartphones.

[...] Even chipmaker Intel, which is testing a similar silicon-based approach in collaboration with Delft-based startup QuTech, talks about times of 1 second — and this is several orders of magnitude longer than what has been achieved by quantum companies using the superconducting approach.

[...] But more importantly, if the silicon approach works, the quantum computer industry would not have to build a new set of chip foundries — they could use the infrastructure that is already there. It would also be easier to combine quantum and classic computers if both use the same silicon chip and transistor architecture.

[...] Some of the quantum computing technologies may also be quite bulky when you scale up to multiple thousands of qubits. But in theory, a million of Quantum Motion's electron-spin qubits could be packed onto a 1cm square chip. You would still need the elaborate chandelier-like refrigerator to keep the chips at a fraction of a kelvin above absolute zero, but just one such refrigerator — similar in size to a server rack — can hold many chips.

Press release.

Also at TechRadar.

Journal Reference:
Virginia N. Ciriano-Tejel, Michael A. Fogarty, Simon Schaal, et al. Spin Readout of a CMOS Quantum Dot by Gate Reflectometry and Spin-Dependent Tunneling [open], PRX Quantum (DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010353)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by maxwell demon on Sunday April 04 2021, @07:44AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 04 2021, @07:44AM (#1133070) Journal

    I don't see the relevance of your link. It has about zero relation to what I wrote.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Disagree=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Disagree' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2