Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday April 04 2021, @04:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the all-the-better-to-track-you-with? dept.

Pixel 6 will be powered by new Google-made 'Whitechapel' chip

9to5Google can report today that Google's upcoming phones for this fall, including the presumed Pixel 6, will be among the first devices to run on the "GS101" Whitechapel chip.

[...] First rumored in early 2020, Whitechapel is an effort on Google's part to create their own systems on a chip (SoCs) to be used in Pixel phones and Chromebooks alike, similar in to how Apple uses their own chips in the iPhone and Mac. Google was said to be co-developing Whitechapel with Samsung, whose Exynos chips rival Snapdragon processors in the Android space.

Per that report, Google would be ready to launch devices with Whitechapel chips as soon as 2021. According to documentation viewed by 9to5Google, this fall's Pixel phones will indeed be powered by Google's Whitechapel platform.

[...] Putting it all together, this fall's Made by Google phones will not use chips made by Qualcomm, but will instead be built on Google's own Whitechapel hardware platform with assistance from Samsung.

Also at The Verge and XDA Developers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 04 2021, @03:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 04 2021, @03:33PM (#1133149)

    yeah, i also like the part where they "lock the bootloader" or what's called. for security. not to make it difficult to install something that can circumvent their "obsolete by design" philosophy. it's for security! your security! ... and their perpetual profit security, lulz.

    there really ought to be a law, that forces smart phone manufacturers to provide a bootloader (or what it's called) unlock tool no later then the day the stop supporting THE SOFTWARE-OS on the device (no more security updates).
    there is really no way to interpret this as first scaremongering (only a locked bootloader is secure) and then "look, new shiney is better and more secure. old device is a lost cause! buy new! be MEOR secure! ofc, again with a locked bootloader".