Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday April 07 2021, @01:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the solo-opinion dept.

Justice Clarence Thomas suggests US should regulate Twitter and Facebook:

Justice Clarence Thomas suggested on Monday that Congress should consider whether laws should be updated to better regulate social media platforms that, he said, have come to have "unbridled control" over "unprecedented" amounts of speech.

The provocative and controversial opinion comes as Twitter banned former President Donald Trump from its platform for violating its rules on incitement of violence and some conservatives have called on more regulations in the tech world to combat what they view as political bias on social media.

"If part of the problem is private, concentrated control over online content and platforms available to the public, then part of the solution may be found in doctrines that limit the right of a private company to exclude, " Thomas wrote in a 12-page concurring opinion Monday.

Thomas's stance will raise concerns from critics who point out that social media platforms have not historically been subject to such content regulation, but instead have been left to devise their policies on their own.

[...] Today's digital platforms, Thomas argued, "provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech," but he said it also concentrates control "of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties."

[...] "The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions," he added.

[...] The conservative justice said that the court will soon have "no choice" but to address how legal doctrines apply to "privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms."

Katie Fallow, a First Amendment expert at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University said that the group actually shares Thomas concern about the power over speech being concentrated in the hands of so few. "But we think that concentrating that same power in the hands of government regulators will not necessarily solve the problems associated with social media companies." Instead, she worried it might exacerbate the issue.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday April 07 2021, @11:54PM

    by c0lo (156) on Wednesday April 07 2021, @11:54PM (#1134524) Journal

    And beyond this America now seems to be falling into increasingly rapid decline, and these companies are all contributing in substantial ways - often at their own expense.

    You're wrong on this one. They are doing it because the rest of the worlds asks them to. You know? Europe and India alone will make an about 5 times larger market than the weird US.

    Don't believe me? For example, have a look on the hate speech legislation [wikipedia.org] around the world, most of which predates the Social Media, with specific recent additions for it (2015-2019). On that list, US is the only one that stick out as a sore thumb.

    Let me repeat it as a convenient reminder: "Better get used to it, the market has spoken".

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2