Forgive the irrelevancies and the digressions, here is as much of the original journal as I could recover. Plus some interesting things about the Indian Nations.
Why the GOP-fueled 'controversy' over critical race theory, nothing to do with critical race theory
Yes, that was the original full title. Might have been clipped.
Reported at The Editorial Board
The right-wing media apparatus, which is global in scale, has lately been making a fetish of something called “critical race theory” (CRT). This has prompted academics to defend it. It’s not a radical political ideology, they say. It’s merely a form of critical inquiry. It is not the boogeyman it’s being made out to be. There’s nothing to fear.
I understand the need to defend critical race theory. Colleges and universities are beset on one hand by Republican fascists accusing scholars of indoctrinating students, on the other by anti-left liberals accusing the same of hostility toward freedom of speech. Meanwhile, administrations act more like corporations that privilege efficiency over research and teaching. It’s enough to think CRT is an appropriate hill to die on.
Yes, this is an opinion piece. That does not necessarily entail that it is not news to most Soylentils. And, the important piece:
Explaining CRT’s particulars to people who seem to fear them won’t change their minds if you don’t also take into account that explaining them can be seen as intolerable aggression.
Put it in the same category as "cultural Marxism", Feminazism, and Woke-ness. Operant conditioning, not intellectual discussion.
This, however, overlooks the larger dynamic at work. The more you defend CRT as an ideologically neutral mode of seeing and thinking about the world, the more the propagandists are going to do what they do best, which is terrifying the ignorant. More importantly, CRT defenders are not seeing the true nature of their opponents. From the authoritarian perspective, modes of seeing and thinking about the world are never ideologically neutral because once you learn to see and think about the world on your own, you don’t need authoritarian leaders to tell you what to see and think.
I risk making them seem like cartoons. I risk making people who treasure “traditional” and “conservative” and “Judeo-Christian” values look like they yippy-skippied over the Enlightenment on their way from the Spanish Inquisition to the 21st-century America. But it’s worth the risk given that most respectable white people, in my opinion, tend to overestimate the societal effects of liberal arts education. Critical thinking is so uncontroversial among respectable white people as to be barely worth mentioning. The authoritarians, however, see it quite clearly for what it is—an existential threat.
This is why the particulars of critical race theory don’t matter.1 (You don’t care about the particulars when you’re fighting for survival!) This is also why explaining those particulars to people who seem to fear them won’t change their minds if you don’t also take into account that explaining the particulars of critical race theory can itself be seen as intolerable aggression. What most of them fear is loss of social control. What most fear is loss of authority. Where you see an individual merely muddling through life the best she can, coming to the best conclusions she can, most of them see an individual whose ideological aggression is so monstrous as to justify any response.
Always wondered by the alt- and elder-right brought this up at the strangest of points in a discussion.
Respectable white people look at the right-wing media apparatus, which is global in scale, and marvel at the fact that Americans consuming its propaganda inhabit a fact-free world. I think what they misunderstand is lying isn’t a bug. It’s a feature. Facts are available to individuals to see and think about on their own, free and independent of authorities licensed to say what individuals see and think. Facts, therefore, are aligned politically with perceived enemies. A rational response to facts is nonstop lying. So “alternate facts” are not a result of authoritarian politics. They are a first principle.
Critical race theory is not a political ideology, but it may as well be to the world of the right-wing media apparatus, which is global in scale. It might as well be because anything that teaches individuals to see and think about facts independent and free of groupthink compromises the integrity of the authoritarian’s grip on the group. Case in point is Wyoming Congresswoman Liz Cheney. The Republican believes the former president tried bringing down the republic. She is factually correct. For the “crime” of seeing and thinking about the world on her own, she’s now being punished. The House Republicans are poised to purge her from the House conference leadership. The Republicans are not individualists. They are collectivists enforcing groupthink.
Who's doing the de-platforming, now?
Other sources:
The GOP’s ‘Critical Race Theory’ Obsession (MSN)
The GOP’s ‘Critical Race Theory’ Obsession (The Atlantic)
Why 'woke' and 'critical race theory' are the GOP's new favorite words (MSNBC)
GOP Looks to Ban ‘Woke Philosophies’ Like Critical Race Theory in Texas Schools (Yahoo)
The GOP’s bizarre obsession with ‘critical race theory’ has almost nothing to do with critical race theory (DroolingDog)
Oklahoma governor signs ban on teaching critical race theory (Madison)
Texas GOP Passes Bill to Ban Critical Race Theory, Stop 'Blaming White Children' for Slavery
Republicans seize on conservative backlash against critical race theory
Freeze Peaches, indeed!
Previously on Critical Race Matters: Who’s afraid of ‘Critical Race Theory’? Jews should embrace the right’s latest bogeyman (Forward.com)
******
There was an update, before the Deluge, something about Oklahoma, where the right-wing nut-jobs were sweeping down the Planes before the Centennial of the Tulsa Race Massacre.
100 years after the Tulsa Race Massacre, last living survivors urge America to not forget, of course. But the Governator of OK signed a law about teaching the Dread Critical Race Theory, and got hisself kicked off the board of the Centennial observance, and was rebuked by the Oklahoma City School board in no uncertain terms.
Oklahoma governor Kevin Stitt, a Republican, was removed from the commission overseeing the 100th anniversary of the Tulsa Race Massacre on Friday after he signed a bill banning critical race theory in the state’s schools.
So sad, it was such a non-racist feather in his cap.
And, this is popping up everywhere, more than Hunter Biden's laptop, or Seth's assassination, or the pimple on Sean Hannity's left cheek. Seriously. Donald Trump allegedly said there were good people on both sides of the Tulsa Massacre.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 24 2021, @11:19PM (7 children)
Not having a point may be a fine response in the education system of today - especially if you major in white oppression - but all it will give you here is one of those valuable +3 Insightful participation awards. Collect 'em all.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 25 2021, @03:19AM (6 children)
Aww widdle boomerboo needs a diapey change?
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday May 25 2021, @06:40AM (5 children)
Well, that degenerated slowly, although less slowly than last time. Would be interesting if we could exhume the original aristarchus CRT journal, and compare comments. On the other hand, perhaps not.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 25 2021, @03:59PM (3 children)
I'm certain you realize that defending CRT on logical and intellectual grounds alone is unlikely to get far, and so in advocacy of CRT you will likely find yourself shoulder to shoulder with more simple types than not, and especially those more moved by pathos over logos.
This is also why you remain a mystery to me. While CRT appeals to educated individuals, this cannot be conflated with it appealing to intelligent individuals. Genuinely familiar with history, seemingly making some pursuit to engage with "the other side" without engaging to monkey poo flinging or just mindless repetition of talking points, and yet still you persist with advocacy for CRT? I find it intriguing, enjoyable, and refreshing - simply because I cannot even begin to understand this, and I do hope you can enlighten me at some point.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 25 2021, @04:41PM
Curiously, it reduces to "defending" versus "defunding" yet again.
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday May 25 2021, @08:44PM (1 child)
What, prithee, gives you the idea I advocate CRT? I am merely drawing attention to an editorial that points out the demonization of an academic discipline by the right-wing media, the type of thing that leaks through the keyboard of morons like Runaway. To repeat the quoted Fine Article:
As others have noted, whether CRT is correct or not is not the question here. Same goes for hendrikboom's [soylentnews.org] forlorn repeated requests to have CRT defined or explained. The point is that those who are attempting to use the power of the state to prohibit a theory do not even understand the theory, and make no serious attempt to do so. They are not respectable white people.
Recent event in Idaho, for another example.
Yes, on the word of a non-student about a right-wing media infused meme of abuse of white students (in Idaho!), the university suspended a class with 1300 students, lest they be corrupted, I guess. This is what this journal is about.
Too much to ask?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 27 2021, @08:28PM
Some Republican radio host was fired for being against Trump. Cancel culture indeed! Hypocrisy and lies are their bread and butter that make up the meals of hate they consume. Ideological and cultural [read: racial] purity is their jam!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 25 2021, @04:06PM
Some gave it another try after the crash, but bad truly does drive out good...
The party's over, it's time to call it a day
They've burst your pretty balloon
And taken the moon away
Now you must wake up, all dreams must end
Take off your makeup, the party's over
It's all over, my friend
It's all over, my friend