Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 10 2014, @11:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the do-you-feel-lucky-punk? dept.

Robert X. Cringely points out the hidden costs of running corporate IT over the public internet:

How cheap is IT, really, if it compromises customer data? Not cheap at all. Last year’s Target hack alone cost the company more than $1 billion, estimated Forrester Research. The comparably-sized Home Depot hack will probably cost about the same. JP Morgan Chase is likely to face even higher costs.

He wonders why companies aren't shifting to dedicated networks, like they used to make with leased lines.

Taking a bank or retail network back to circa 1989 would go a long way toward ending the current rash of data breaches. It would be expensive, sure, but not as expensive as losing all the money that Target and others have recently done.

Is this practical? If so, how would it be accomplished with modern equipment?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 10 2014, @12:25PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 10 2014, @12:25PM (#104422)

    How can the device or system actually storing the backup report whether the storage was successful or not if the communication only goes one way?

    How can the data be retrieved from the backup server for legitimate restorations if the communication only goes one way?