Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 10 2014, @11:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the do-you-feel-lucky-punk? dept.

Robert X. Cringely points out the hidden costs of running corporate IT over the public internet:

How cheap is IT, really, if it compromises customer data? Not cheap at all. Last year’s Target hack alone cost the company more than $1 billion, estimated Forrester Research. The comparably-sized Home Depot hack will probably cost about the same. JP Morgan Chase is likely to face even higher costs.

He wonders why companies aren't shifting to dedicated networks, like they used to make with leased lines.

Taking a bank or retail network back to circa 1989 would go a long way toward ending the current rash of data breaches. It would be expensive, sure, but not as expensive as losing all the money that Target and others have recently done.

Is this practical? If so, how would it be accomplished with modern equipment?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Friday October 10 2014, @01:04PM

    by VLM (445) on Friday October 10 2014, @01:04PM (#104437)

    Lower latency and much lower jitter, its obvious if you're not getting switched or multiplexed...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Saturday October 11 2014, @07:43AM

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Saturday October 11 2014, @07:43AM (#104711) Homepage Journal

    We used Multitech multiplexers on leased lines from branch offices between banks. Impressive shit, even at 9600 baud! Leased lines, in my day, were just a batphone. Not sure what kinda speed you can get now.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0x663EB663D1E7F223