Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Sunday June 06 2021, @03:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the good dept.

Reducing poverty can actually lower energy demand, finds research:

[...] We found that households that do have access to clean fuels, safe water, basic education and adequate food—that is, those not in extreme poverty—can use as little as half the energy of the national average in their country.

This is important, as it goes directly against the argument that more resources and energy will be needed for people in the global south to escape extreme poverty. The biggest factor is the switch from traditional cooking fuels, like firewood or charcoal, to more efficient (and less polluting) electricity and gas.

In Zambia, Nepal and Vietnam, modern energy resources are extremely unfairly distributed—more so than income, general spending, or even spending on leisure. As a consequence, poorer households use more dirty energy than richer households, with ensuing health and gender impacts. Cooking with inefficient fuels consumes a lot of energy, and even more when water needs to be boiled before drinking.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 06 2021, @06:48PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 06 2021, @06:48PM (#1142437)

    Here, the smart psychopaths have a pretty good record compared to the bleeding hearts.

    Khallow! A higher body-count is not a metric of success!

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Sunday June 06 2021, @10:58PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 06 2021, @10:58PM (#1142504) Journal
    You mean lower body count. Better living conditions, lower fertility, more wealth, more capable societies. Those psychopaths may be terrible people, but we got this figured out. When XYZ needs to be done, it's better to do it in the developing world - even for the developing world - than to not do it at all.