Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Sunday October 12 2014, @02:07PM   Printer-friendly
from the whose-side-are-you-on? dept.

Brianna Wu, head of the independent gaming studio Giant Spacekat, was the target of a series of tweets containing death threats on Friday; one published her home address (since redacted). The poster's Twitter account has been disabled.

Wu responded on Friday night with the tweet:

Brianna Wu @Spacekatgal

The police just came by. Husband and I are going somewhere safe.

Remember, #gamergate isn't about attacking women.

GamerGate supporters denounced the threats and "doxxing" against Wu and disavowed the poster. However, several suspected that the tweets were a false flag created by anti-GamerGate forces:

Sun Knight @SunKnightO

@Sen_Armstrong @Spacekatgal @chatterwhiteman It's clearly either a troll or false flag shame that people actually think its legit.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @04:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @04:59PM (#105092)

    What part of "never reviewed" do you fail to understand?

    The only thing relevant to "journalistic ethics" is whether or not she was given special treatment for whatever reason.

    > Or that she slept with them for unrelated reasons?

    Your thinking that such a question has any sort of relevancy confirms the accusations that gamergate is about misogyny.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:06PM (#105098)

    Well if you wrote clearly the first time no one would misunderstand.

    I never claimed I was in gamergate, or a gamer at all.
    But thanks for playing the "make up bullshit to support my point of view" game.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:14PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:14PM (#105101)

      > Well if you wrote clearly the first time no one would misunderstand.

      How could you possibly think her sex life was at all relevant?
      Really, what part of "ethics" do you think might possibly apply?

      > I never claimed I was in gamergate, or a gamer at all.

      Two can play that game. I never claimed you were in gamergate.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:40PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:40PM (#105115)

        Being in gaming development and having any sort of personal relationship with games journalists is clearly an ethics violation. Why put ethics in quotes. It is not a scary word. It is not made up. It is the study of what is right and what is wrong. Conflicts of interest are thought of as wrong, therefore if someone's sex life and professional life overlap, then it is unethical.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:55PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:55PM (#105129)

          > Being in gaming development and having any sort of personal relationship with games journalists is clearly an ethics violation.

          How so? Seriously. I expect you to claim the extremist position that any relationship is defacto evidence of an "ethics" violation. Which is just bullshit. Ethics violations actually require a violation. Unless the reporter actually gives favorable coverage to the person they are involved with there is no "ethics" violation.

          > Why put ethics in quotes.

          I put it in quotes to make it evident that I think the definition people like you are using is absurd.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:58PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:58PM (#105135)

          Being in gaming development and having any sort of personal relationship with games journalists is clearly an ethics violation.

          Wrong. People can have relationships with whomever they want. Reviewing your partner's or ex-partner's work is an ethics violation, but that didn't happen here, so its irrelevant, nothing more than a red herring.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM (#105151)

          How DARE you bring common sense and responsibility into this discussion!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:15PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:15PM (#105157)

            Responding to yourself is stupid and easy to spot. You can sock puppet all you want, but its pretty obvious.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:19PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:19PM (#105162)

              I don't think it is a sockpuppet. I think there really is more than one person who thinks that logic is impeccable.
              There are a whole bunch of them in gamergate. It's kind of a requirement to join.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:27PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:27PM (#105167)

                Nah, I'm pretty sure its all that one guy who thinks every AC poster is Tork. Even this post is by him, and yours definitely is.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:41PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:41PM (#105253)

          Being in gaming development and having any sort of personal relationship with games journalists is clearly an ethics violation.

          That's just ridiculous. By that token, it seems like no two people in the same professional field should be allowed to communicate outside of job. Ethics, or at least publishing ethics, isn't about building impersonal walls between humans, it's about managing your relationships to avoid conflicts of interest.

          Sleeping with the person who recommends your product, or who recommends you for promotion: conflict of interest. Recusing yourself from reviewing your girlfriend's product: ethical. Quitting your job because you're attracted to someone who works in the field: Hollywood melodrama.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:50PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:50PM (#105125)

        Maybe we're asking the wrong question.

        How about, why did 5 game journalists sleep with her?

        That way all of the blame is on the corrupt male game journalists.

        Better?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:01PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:01PM (#105138)

          > Maybe we're asking the wrong question.

          You are indeed.

          > How about, why did 5 game journalists sleep with her?

          Nope. Still the wrong question. But points for realizing that what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

          > That way all of the blame is on the corrupt male game journalists.

          Except there was no corruption.
          Any hypothetical motivation is irrelevant when there is no crime.
          I keep waiting to see evidence of a crime and there has been none.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:08PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:08PM (#105145)

            If it looks like a duck...
            Why did she choose to cheat/sleep with only those in the game Journal Industry?
            I never said it was a crime, (that I know of anyways), I only wanted to know her motivation.

            If they're "too sexy it hurts", then I'm not bothered by it.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM (#105149)

              > I only wanted to know her motivation.

              None of your fucking business.
              Really. Why do you think you are entitled to know why someone decides to sleep with anyone?

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:17PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:17PM (#105159)

                Because it shines a light on a larger issue that should be addressed. Women in the gaming industry shouldn't have to sleep with game Journalists to promote their work.
                Why did you think I cared?? Asshole.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:25PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:25PM (#105165)

                  > Women in the gaming industry shouldn't have to sleep with game Journalists to promote their work.

                  Who says they have to?

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @09:34PM

                    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @09:34PM (#105278)

                    Um, we're trying to find out if that is what happened.
                    Except every time we ask a question we get a shitstorm of OMG sexists assholes!!!! as a response.
                    Which only makes us believe more in the likelihood of a coverup.
                    The slander articles and their "coordinated" timing seem suspicious as well.

                • (Score: 2) by cafebabe on Monday October 13 2014, @06:05AM

                  by cafebabe (894) on Monday October 13 2014, @06:05AM (#105442) Journal

                  Women in the gaming industry shouldn't have to sleep with game Journalists to promote their work.

                  No-one should have to sleep with journalists to obtain favorable reviews. However, five journalists (who may or may not enjoyed sexual relations with one woman) gave dis-proportionately good reviews for a "game" which consists of stateless HTML wrapped with a full-screen web browser.

                  --
                  1702845791×2
                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @06:16AM

                    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @06:16AM (#105444)

                    "Good reviews exist for a game I personally thought was shit!" is not proof of anything, except that the reviewers apparently like visual novels. Visual novels are pretty big in Japan, and have a niche market here in the US; so what? Where are these five reviews along with the proof that the game's creator fucked them within a week - or hell, a month - of the review? Without that, all you have is proof that your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

                    • (Score: 3, Informative) by cafebabe on Monday October 13 2014, @07:20AM

                      by cafebabe (894) on Monday October 13 2014, @07:20AM (#105450) Journal

                      "Good reviews exist for a game I personally thought was shit!" is not proof of anything, except that the reviewers apparently like visual novels. Visual novels are pretty big in Japan, and have a niche market here in the US; so what?

                      It would be an improvement if it was a visual novel.

                      Where are these five reviews along with the proof that the game's creator fucked them within a week - or hell, a month - of the review?

                      I've done game testing professionally and I've seen the effort that goes into games that flop. I've also seen how developers react when a reviewer doesn't understand a feature in a game. And I would hope that it is generally understood that game reviews are critical in some area even when a game pushes boundaries in many areas. However, if someone publishes a few webpages, they can expect most influential Steam reviews to contain the following:-

                      This is a free text based experience that just has you clicking hyperlinks as you would a webpage. I can't really call it a game since I don't think the point is to entertain you. It was originally a website and this is just the web-kit version of the site put on Steam.

                      Point blank: I think this game fails at what it set out to do. It doesn't make the user understand depression at all. In fact, it's just the story of some overpriviledged guy too stuck in his head. Nothing awful actually happens to the character. The player isn't made to sympathize with him in any way.

                      First of all, I hold no grudge against any group, this is merely how I truely think of this program.

                      Depression Quest is a program that focuses on what appears to be chronic depression and more specifically from a female mindset. Keeping in mind that this is dubbed "an interactive fiction game" with almost no gameplay, I would like to think of this program as more of a webpage story. The writing in this program is at a level of articulation and description that I would expect from a middle school student. Personally, I was disapointed in the level of writing most of all, with this program being a text-based program.

                      As for the gameplay, it's completely told through text with decisions at the bottom, like Choose Your Own Adventure books. The writer was of average quality. It wasn't horrible, but it wasn't exactly Virginia Wolfe either. The choices frustrated me, however, by having you frequently unable to select more positive choices over more negative ones. I get that this was to simulate the 'it will never get better' feelings of depression, but there is a difference between feeling it will never improve and actively being unable to make a positive choice in your life, even ones like seeing a therapist. When I was depressed, they couldn't make me NOT see one.

                      This is not a game. It is a digital "choose your own adventure" book, except none of the choices you make actually effect the ending.

                      You may imply that I am a conspiracist but this is not a game which obtained distribution through intrinsic merit.

                      --
                      1702845791×2
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @04:52PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @04:52PM (#105629)

                The 1st Amendment allows me to ask whatever I like. You can also run your mouth protecting sluts as much as you like too.

                Why is this slut shaming anyway? Is she ashamed of sleeping with 5 game journalists?

                I actually wish more women slept around, because you really need to get laid!

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @04:58PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @04:58PM (#105632)

                Now imagine your wife slept with 5 mob bosses.

                It's none of your business, she can sleep with whomever she likes.

                So I won't advice you to flee the country, just stay put like the good little doggie you are.

        • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:02PM

          by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:02PM (#105139) Journal

          No, not better. That position doesn't fucking fix anything.

          I don't give a shit who she's slept with. I've slept with a lot of guys! It's easy to do! What fucking difference does it make?

          The problem here is that an entire demographic is being blamed for the actions of a few individuals. We know who they are! Cut off their balls and inject them with estrogen! Be done with it.

          Except we won't. We'll go after every 3rd party who is assigned the male gender on a legal document who likes to play games. How the hell does that fix anything?

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:13PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:13PM (#105155)

            You slut! Go die in a hole as filthy as you are! Oh wait, you're a guy, aren't you? High Five bro! ^5

            • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:09PM

              by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:09PM (#105236) Journal

              Thank you for identifying a big issue of sexism.

              Thank you also for identifying a big issue of cissexism that you white knights can't seem to get past.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:07PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:07PM (#105143)

          How about, why did 5 game journalists sleep with her?

          Who cares? Its got nothing to do with this, merely a red herring and strawman used as an excuse to justify slut shaming, an inherently misogynistic action.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:15PM (#105102)

    Oh for fucks sake, not this garbage again. Nathan Grayson mentioned her game in an article in Rock Paper Shotgun [archive.today] back in January, then he covered Zoe's "Game Jam" [kotaku.com] at the end of March after she was responsible for tanking the same project run by The Fine Young Capitalist (TFYC) to get women in to gaming.

    This has been stated over and over and over and every time someone insisting it doesn't exist pops up, then when it's pointed out they come back with, "well that's not a review". Seriously just fuck off already.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:31PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:31PM (#105108)

      This has been stated over and over and over and every time someone insisting it doesn't exist pops up, then when it's pointed out they come back with, "well that's not a review". Seriously just fuck off already.

      So, what I am getting from you is that you have a problem with reality. Not only is it "not a review" it isn't particularly favorable towards her or any of her work. If you think it is, perhaps you could quote the lines that actually endorse her rather than just describe how someone else was shitty towards her.

      after she was responsible for tanking the same project run by The Fine Young Capitalist (TFYC) to get women in to gaming.

      True or not, I don't see how that's relevant to the charge of journalistic corruption versus a complaint about her as an individual.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:59PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:59PM (#105136)

        It shows a pattern of shitty/unethical behavior.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:13PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:13PM (#105153)

          > It shows a pattern of shitty/unethical behavior.

          Is she a journalist? No. Case fucking closed.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @09:37PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @09:37PM (#105281)

            So because she's not a journalist she's incapable of unethical behavior?
            Or do non-journalists have some type of diplomatic immunity to it?

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:22PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:22PM (#105304)

              So because she's not a journalist she's incapable of unethical behavior?

              What part of "journalistic ethics" do you fail to understand?

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:38PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:38PM (#105317)

                The "ethics" part. It does mean "everything done by somebody I like", making "ethical violation" mean "everything done by somebody I don't like", right?

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @12:09AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 13 2014, @12:09AM (#105346)

                So journalistic ethics are the only kind of ethics?
                And unethical behavior by journalists can only involve journalists?
                Because if a non-journalist is evolved everyone is a sexist pig?

                Am I doing it right?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:18PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:18PM (#105161)

          Only if you look at it with the intent to use it as proof of that, having already made your mind up and simply looking for anything to justify your pre-made conclusion.

          In reality it shows nothing of the sort.

  • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:57PM

    by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @05:57PM (#105134) Journal

    Of course gamer-gate is about misogyny.

    Why aren't we holding the individuals^H^H^H^H^Hassholes involved accountable?

    I am sick of being dragged into this shit because of my assigned gender. I am sick of being held accountable for sexual harassment and date rape.

    Get me my fucking Obamacare sex change or drop the issue.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:02PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:02PM (#105140)

      SJW logic...
      You sound white, you must be a KKK member then.
      Don't like being called a member of the KKK?

      Fine you're a leader of the KKK and you rape children?
      Don't like that? Well I guess it must be true then.

      • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM

        by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:11PM (#105150) Journal

        Somebody mod parent insightful. I'd use one of my mod points, but I opened my fat mouth already.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:08PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:08PM (#105147)

      > I am sick of being dragged into this shit because of my assigned gender.

      No one but you is dragging you into anything.

      Seriously.

      You can go about your life doing your own thing and not only will no one say anything to you about gamerassholes, no one will even know you are a male gamer.

      The only time you get accused of being a gamerasshole is when you get all thin-skinned about somebody criticizing someone other than yourself and take it personally. Or you know, you decide that hey those gamerassholes have a point when they aren't yelling whore at people and think you should stick up for them. But that's you dragging yourself and not any sort of assignment.

      • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:51PM

        by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:51PM (#105182) Journal

        Nope, sorry, you lose.

        I have been held accountable to my face by various sexist feminist bitches for the actions of others.

        Yes, me personally.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:53PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @06:53PM (#105184)

          > I have been held accountable to my face by various sexist feminist bitches for the actions of others.

          Held accountable for being a gamerasshole? No you weren't. You are lying.

          • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:19PM

            by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:19PM (#105195) Journal

            You've never been a target of sexism?

            You think it's unpossible that an assigned male might be a target of sexism?

            You think it's unpossible that women can be sexists?

            You think ti's unpossible that an assigned male might have been a target of sexism on multiple occasions?

            What did all that sexism accomplish? Clearly nothing, because here we have gamer-gate.

            Feh, hell, I wonder if my home-ec teacher still hates me for being better at baking and sewing than the cisgendered girls in her class. That had to have been the most unwilling A I've ever received.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:24PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:24PM (#105201)

              > You think it's unpossible that an assigned male might be a target of sexism?

              As I noted earlier, all your rage here has nothing to do with gamergate and everything to do with being an "assigned male."

              I'm think your bitterness about being assigned a gender has made you see gamergate as being assigned to you personally.

              • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:56PM

                by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:56PM (#105226) Journal

                Again, you don't seem to understand that some brain-damaged sexist policy will likely come about because of this.

                I've said before, we know who the individual is. Cut off his balls and inject him with estrogen.

                Hell, you're right. My complaint is being legally male. Cut off my balls and inject me with estrogen! My liver might appreciate it.

                Yet, my complaint at being legally male is valid. I am not a part of gamer-gate or whatever, but I am concerned that some brain-damaged sexist policy will be enacted.

                I suppose the sentiments that I should shut up until such a policy does come through are valid. However, I'd rather protest loudly here than need to lawyer up later.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:59PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @07:59PM (#105227)

                  > Again, you don't seem to understand that some brain-damaged sexist policy will likely come about because of this.

                  Ok, how about you explain what kind of brain-damaged sexist policy will likely come about because of this.
                  Make it good because what I expect to hear from you is something from a fever dream.

                  • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:21PM

                    by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:21PM (#105244) Journal

                    Ok, you made me laugh.

                    What about propositions to limit one's avatar to one's legal gender?

                    Haha, I went to look for that referece, probably from 2003 or so, I think it was a Microsoft policy, but instead I found an actual implementation [blogs.com].

                    Of course, given the specifics, I have nothing to bitch about. I don't play that game and even if I did, I'd likely "pass" and get permission for a female avatar whether I was trying to or not. I worry about some friends who do not get gendered female as often as I do.

                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:43PM

                      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:43PM (#105255)

                      > What about propositions to limit one's avatar to one's legal gender?

                      That's funny, because I would expect the result to go the other way. That games which didn't let people play as other genders would be sanctioned. The entire point of the feminists is that gamergater dudebros don't know what its like to be a woman online.

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:46PM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @08:46PM (#105257)

                        >gamergater dudebros

                        #NotYourSlur

                      • (Score: 2) by velex on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:03PM

                        by velex (2068) on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:03PM (#105292) Journal

                        Feminists are peculiar in this way.

                        They want to cut your balls off right up until they find out that you would like that. They want to put you in a dress right up until they find out you have several dresses you like to wear, then suddenly it's a matter of being a rapist because you get gendered female too often for their tastes.

                        If I'm remembering the brain-damage correctly, it was the same matter as it is with feminist transphobia. The feminists are horrified at the possibility that anybody who was assigned the male gender at birth might gain female privilege (or heaven help us sneak into the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival).

                        Feminism is all about chauvenism and cis-woman privilege. It's complete sexism.

                        Also, the feminists are afraid that somebody like me might be gendered by somebody else as female and learn what it's really like to be a woman. It makes it very difficult to believe their victim power bullshit after being extended female privilege both online and offline. They hate that there are people like me who know exactly what it's like to be a woman. Maybe they should just fucking drop their "bathroom rape" shit and let me be a woman full time. Then I wouldn't post angry shit when I'm looking forward to being forced to present as a male yet again and be accountable for the actions of these gamer-gate shitheads.

                        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:13PM

                          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:13PM (#105297)

                          Your definition of feminism is wrong.
                          I don't think you are able to hear any other definition.
                          It is kind of sad.

                          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:28PM

                            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:28PM (#105311)

                            That's why social justice warrior is a good term to have. It allows you to separate proactive feminists from whiny loser feminists.

                            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:35PM

                              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:35PM (#105315)

                              > That's why social justice warrior is a good term to have. It allows you to separate proactive feminists from whiny loser feminists.

                              That's odd. I use it to identify whiny loser misogynists and racists.

                              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:38PM

                                by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:38PM (#105316)

                                > That's odd. I use it to identify whiny loser misogynists and racists.

                                That's ok. Everybody makes mistakes [reddit.com].

                          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:30PM

                            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:30PM (#105312)

                            She's describing the de facto definition of feminism. It's the only definition that actually matters.

                            Any dictionary/academic/de jure definition of feminism is irrelevant.

                            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:32PM

                              by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:32PM (#105313)

                              > She's describing the de facto definition of feminism.

                              Nope. She's describing something she personally experienced once or twice and which has been reinforced by the gleeful howls of anti-progressives.

                        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:28PM

                          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12 2014, @10:28PM (#105310)

                          This woman knows what she's talking about! Mod her up!