Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday June 18 2021, @09:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the 00aa23e67f100945c87d19e4012f dept.

WSJ: What Keeps People From Using Password Managers?

No pay wall: https://archive.is/HCtcT

Many of us are vulnerable to hackers and eager to secure our online accounts, but lots of us also refuse to use an obvious solution: password managers.

Why? Our research has found that the typical reassurances and promises about password managers just don’t work. Fortunately, our research also suggests there are strategies that can persuade people to get past the psychological barriers and keep their data safe.

[...] In a study I conducted with my Ph.D. student Norah Alkaldi, we found that the two most common methods of persuasion were ineffective in getting people to adopt password managers. The first is the “push” approach—the idea that by showing people the dangers of using simple passwords, recording passwords on their computer or using the same passwords at different sites, we would push them to adopt a safer approach. Users, we found, don’t respond to the push strategy.

[...] The other, “pull,” approach—focusing on the positives of password managers—didn’t deliver any better results.

[...] We discovered two types of “mooring factors” that keep people from changing their behavior.

[...] First, there was the effort required to enter all your passwords into the password manager.

[...] People also fear they will lose all their passwords if they forget their master password.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Sunday June 20 2021, @01:10AM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Sunday June 20 2021, @01:10AM (#1147376) Homepage Journal

    Is the keepassXC password database distributed? Can it reasonably be managed with distributed revision management system like, for example, monotone?
    (I pick monotone instead of git because I prefer it).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 20 2021, @03:41PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 20 2021, @03:41PM (#1147510)

    You can distribute it using whatever file sync tools or services you like. One of the strengths of keepass is that it isn't coupled to an online service, you can use none or whichever you like. Just make sure not to overwrite changes made on one computer with ones from another. If in doubt, you can manually sync databases from time to time. I recommend using a different file for sync than usage of you're going to sync between computers to prevent logins from being lost due to sync mistakes.

    • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Monday June 21 2021, @03:14PM

      by hendrikboom (1125) on Monday June 21 2021, @03:14PM (#1147685) Homepage Journal

      If the file consists of lines, and the lines are separately encrypted, and each data base entry is a line, any decent distributed revision management tool should be able to handle the situation, requiring manual intervention only when there are conflicting changes.

      So my question becomes : is this so?