IMHO the submitter should never tag the priority, as it will either be a) abused, or b) ignored. In a previous workplace our bug tracking system had 2 priority fields. One was visible to the users, who always tagged everything as top priority and highest urgency. The other was visible to the tech team who estimated the real priority from the user-suggested priority and a broader knowledge of the organisation. It would have been a career-limiting move to allow the users to know this.
Let the editors make these decisions and maintain an independent viewpoint.
In the system I'm proposing, the urgency level would simply be the submitter's opinion, which the editor would be made aware of - possibly at the same time as being made aware of the Karma of the submitter. It would still be down to the editor to chose if & when to post any particular story.
My take on some priority levels:
Urgency Level 1 - Important breaking news that should ideally be considered soon
Urgency Level 2 - Breaking news that may be worth considering soon
Urgency Level 3 - Today's news.
Urgency Level 4 - Best posted within the next few days
Urgency Level 5 - Best posted within the next few weeks
Urgency Level 6 - Non-urgent
I suppose I'm assuming that every now & then, an editor thinks "right, time to post a story", and has a look at all the submissions. When they do so, they might sort by urgency - as long as they don't defer to it too much (because we certainly need level 6 submissions quite often).
Furthermore, some editors might chose to receive an alert (email, for example) whenever a user above a certain Karma level submits what they claim is a level 1 or 2 story.
Most "Ask Soylent" type submissions should be Urgency Level 6.
I've submitted two stories so far, and I would have declared them as levels 3 and 5 respectively.
(Score: 2) by jt on Sunday March 09 2014, @02:50AM
IMHO the submitter should never tag the priority, as it will either be a) abused, or b) ignored. In a previous workplace our bug tracking system had 2 priority fields. One was visible to the users, who always tagged everything as top priority and highest urgency. The other was visible to the tech team who estimated the real priority from the user-suggested priority and a broader knowledge of the organisation. It would have been a career-limiting move to allow the users to know this.
Let the editors make these decisions and maintain an independent viewpoint.
(Score: 2) by Open4D on Sunday March 16 2014, @02:00PM
In the system I'm proposing, the urgency level would simply be the submitter's opinion, which the editor would be made aware of - possibly at the same time as being made aware of the Karma of the submitter. It would still be down to the editor to chose if & when to post any particular story.
My take on some priority levels:
I suppose I'm assuming that every now & then, an editor thinks "right, time to post a story", and has a look at all the submissions. When they do so, they might sort by urgency - as long as they don't defer to it too much (because we certainly need level 6 submissions quite often).
Furthermore, some editors might chose to receive an alert (email, for example) whenever a user above a certain Karma level submits what they claim is a level 1 or 2 story.
Most "Ask Soylent" type submissions should be Urgency Level 6.
I've submitted two stories so far, and I would have declared them as levels 3 and 5 respectively.