Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 28 2021, @05:15PM   Printer-friendly

Intel to make a custom SiFive-based RISC-V CPU, will be fabricated on a 7 nm node in a first step towards competing directly with Arm-based chips

The partnership will see Intel license SiFive's IP to create its own SiFive P550-based 64-bit SoC that it will fabricate on its new 7 nm node. It will form the basis of a new development platform Intel is calling Horse Creek, and will be made available to customers interested in exploring its potential in various applications involving embedded SoC tech. This could mean smartphones, but also cars, IoT products and the like. If Intel gets enough interest, it could take the relationship further. Intel hasn't yet revealed the technical specifications of the SoC, so we don't know whether it will be a single-core or multi-core platform, although the latter is likely. It's GPU tech is also unknown at this time, but Xe-based graphics are likely.

While the first Horse Creek SoCs will be ready next year, it isn't likely we will see any Intel RISC-V-based chips in commercially available products until 2023 at least.

SiFive recently announced two new high-performance 64-bit RISC-V cores, the Performance P550 and Performance P270:

SiFive compares the Performance P550 core to Arm's Cortex-A75 with higher performance in SPECint2006 and SPECfp2006 integer/floating-point benchmark, all [in] a much smaller area which would enable a quad-core P550 cluster on about the same footprint as a single Cortex-A75 core.

See also: Ubuntu 20.04/21.04 64-bit RISC-V released for QEMU, HiFive boards

Previously: Intel May Attempt to Acquire SiFive for $2 Billion


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 28 2021, @07:17PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 28 2021, @07:17PM (#1150514)

    Both Intel and AMD are well aware that x86 will be obsoleted eventually, that's why they are buying FPGA designers... Cutting-edge research and supercomputers can have specialized hardware processors, the rest of us will be just fine with processors that can optimize themselves for any workload with a few kernel calls, and run any legacy software with ease. I'd be more worried about VMWare than Intel...

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Monday June 28 2021, @07:35PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 28 2021, @07:35PM (#1150525) Journal

    Both Intel and AMD are going to have "mainstream" 24-core CPUs and adopt variations of big.LITTLE within the next 3 years for better performance-per-area and power efficiency. x86 will be 10 years away from dying for years to come.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Mojibake Tengu on Monday June 28 2021, @07:59PM

      by Mojibake Tengu (8598) on Monday June 28 2021, @07:59PM (#1150537) Journal

      It's not "x86", x86 is already dead. More and more distros abandoning 32-bit. It's AMD64, since the very first Athlon64 CPU when Intel had to license the AMD ISA to survive into the new millenium.

      At one moment in history, we'll get pure AMD64 architecture, the CPU powered starting in full 64long addressing mode without all that 16-bit and 32-bit junk shit kept along only because of Microsoft, without all those instructions unusable and forbidden in 64long.

      I remember a tiny piece of source code released for public in early 2000's, written by someone at AMD to demonstrate lockless data structures in pure assembly, the then new architecture was called X64 in headers, internally.

      --
      The edge of 太玄 cannot be defined, for it is beyond every aspect of design
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Monday June 28 2021, @09:34PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 28 2021, @09:34PM (#1150581) Journal

      I think due to inertia, the x86 and x64 platform will be here for a very, very long time.

      Heck, look at IBM mainframes. COBOL.

      But I think a shift is coming where it won't be the cool shiny thing any more. It will be a way to run legacy software. These kinds of changes do not ever happen overnight.

      --
      If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious