Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday October 14 2014, @09:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the MAX-FORWARDS dept.

Twenty years ago today (13 October 1994), Mosaic Communications Corporation released the Mosaic Navigator, the first commercial browser for the World Wide Web. This was just six months after the company was founded by ex-Silicon Graphics CEO Jim Clark, and Marc Andreesen, a recent computer science graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Andreesen had co-developed the Mosaic Web browser while working for the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), on UIUC's campus; Clark, who had been losing a power struggle at Silicon Graphics, the company he'd founded, was restless and looking for an adventure and revenge. Andreesen quickly convinced the band of programmers from UIUC he'd worked with on Mosaic and web server development, to relocate to Silicon Valley.

Both the company and the browser were re-branded 'Netscape' a month after the product was released, settling a lawsuit by the UIUC, who regarded Mosaic as intellectual property belonging to the university.

Andreessen and Netscape moved fast, even by the standards of the personal computing business at the time. After Microsoft entered the game (they jump started development by buying rights to a web browser created by Spyglass), Netscape pumped out Navigator 2.0 a little more than a year later, unveiling JavaScript, frames, cookies, plug-ins, SSL (2.0, the first released version), and integrated mail and news readers. Oh, and client-side integration with a mysterious new language called Java.

Bill Gates broadcast his famous "Internet Tidal Wave" memo to the troops at Microsoft in May 1995. Internet Explorer 1.0 was released in August 1995; future versions of IE were bundled with Windows 95, as Microsoft tried (rather successfully) to "cut off Netscape's air supply", as Microsoft Vice President Paul Maritz is alleged to have ranted at the time. Microsoft's actions against Netscape and numerous other competitors in the software industry became the subject of an antitrust suit brought by the US Department of Justice.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Sir Garlon on Tuesday October 14 2014, @02:08PM

    by Sir Garlon (1264) on Tuesday October 14 2014, @02:08PM (#105934)

    They want sites to look pretty, with readability and efficiency mere afterthoughts at best.

    This. Web pages of 1997 generally looked like articles in a magazine with low production values. Web sites today look like advertisements in a magazine with high production values. I do not consider this progress.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Marand on Tuesday October 14 2014, @02:19PM

    by Marand (1081) on Tuesday October 14 2014, @02:19PM (#105940) Journal

    Web pages of 1997 generally looked like articles in a magazine with low production values. Web sites today look like advertisements in a magazine with high production values.

    I like that comparison. I'd mentioned the magazine influence in another comment, but comparing the fluff sites to the advertisements nails it.

    Also, speaking of print, it's a shame that multi-column text flow doesn't tend to work well with websites. We're stuck in this purgatory of excess whitespace or too-long lines that hinder readability because HTML and widescreen resolutions just don't play well together.