Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday October 16 2014, @01:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the frei-für-alles dept.

The Center for American Progress reports

Prospective students in the United States who can't afford to pay for college or don't want to rack up tens of thousands in student debt should try their luck in Germany. Higher education is now free throughout the country, even for international students. Yesterday, Lower Saxony became the last of seven German states to abolish tuition fees, which were already extremely low compared to those paid in the United States.

German universities only began charging for tuition in 2006, when the German Constitutional Court ruled that limited fees, combined with loans, were not in conflict the country's commitment to universal education. The measure proved unpopular, however, and German states that had instituted fees began dropping them one by one.

"We got rid of tuition fees because we do not want higher education which depends on the wealth of the parents," Gabrielle Heinen-Kjajic, the minister for science and culture in Lower Saxony, said in a statement. Her words were echoed by many in the German government. "Tuition fees are unjust," said Hamburg's senator for science Dorothee Stapelfeldt. "They discourage young people who do not have a traditional academic family background from taking up study. It is a core task of politics to ensure that young women and men can study with a high quality standard free of charge in Germany."

[...]Free education is a concept that is embraced in most of Europe with notable exceptions like the U.K., where the government voted to lift the cap on university fees in 2010. The measure has reportedly cost more money than it brought in. The Guardian reported in March that students are failing to pay back student loans at such a rate that "the government will lose more money than it would have saved from keeping the old £3,000 ($4,865) tuition fee system."

[...]learning German might be the best financial choice an American high school student can make.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by q.kontinuum on Thursday October 16 2014, @08:15PM

    by q.kontinuum (532) on Thursday October 16 2014, @08:15PM (#106791) Journal

    My German is quite good, thanks :-) I just didn't have the time to read it before. As you might have noticed, I also answered to this specific statement. I fully agree with this law. The purpose of the lecture is to teach. The task of the student is to learn / know stuff at the end of the term. When I studied, to most lectures the attendance was actually optional. Exams however where not, and some professors introduced new material in their lectures which could not be found in any scripts. They usually announced the risk during one of the first lectures and therefore implicitly created an obligation to attend the lecture, but in accordance with the law.

    On the other hand, our mathematics professor explicitly stated during the first lecture that he's not at all interested in our attendance and provides a completely sufficient script for those who prefer to learn at home. He wanted to spend more quality time with those students who were actually interested in listening to him / asking questions, instead of having 200 additional students in the room who are bored and do not profit at all from his efforts.

    --
    Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2