SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the must-protect-endangered-competitors dept.
FAA warns SpaceX that massive Starship launch tower in Texas is unapproved:
The Federal Aviation Administration warned Elon Musk's SpaceX in a letter two months ago that the company's work on a launch tower for future Starship rocket launches is yet unapproved, and will be included in the agency's ongoing environmental review of the facility in Boca Chica, Texas.
"The company is building the tower at its own risk," an FAA spokesperson told CNBC on Wednesday, noting that the environmental review could recommend taking down the launch tower.
[...] SpaceX has conducted multiple short test flights of Starship prototypes over the past year. However, the company needs the FAA to complete the environmental review and issue a license to take the next step in the rocket's testing.
[...] Starship prototypes stand at about 160 feet tall, or around the size of a 16-story building, and are built of stainless steel – representing the early version of the rocket that Musk unveiled in 2019. The rocket initially launches on a "Super Heavy" booster, which makes up the bottom half of the rocket and stands about 230 feet tall. Together, Starship a\ nd Super Heavy will be nearly 400 feet tall when stacked for the launch.
Elon Musk's SpaceX could be ordered to take down its huge Starship launch tower in Boca Chica, the FAA has warned:
[...] "It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts," the FAA letter said, per Reuters. The FAA added that it had only learned that the integration tower was being built "based on publicly available video footage."
[...] The FAA said SpaceX told it in May that it doesn't think the review is necessary because it plans to use the launch tower "for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or permitted launches," per Reuters' report.
But the FAA said that SpaceX documentation "indicates otherwise," including one document saying that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle, the report said.
[...] Musk blasted the agency in February for canceling SpaceX's Starship flight following a reported launch license violation, and claimed that "humanity will never get to Mars" under new FAA rules.
Maybe launch platforms in the ocean are more regulation friendly.
Also at Ars Technica.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by deimtee on Saturday July 17 2021, @01:54AM (2 children)
It's pretty obvious somebody isn't greasing enough palms at the FAA:
"You have to scrub a launch because we can't be bothered to get one of our bureaucrats there on time".
"Nice building you have there, be a shame if you had to tear it down"
No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Kell on Saturday July 17 2021, @02:33AM
Precisely this - this is an attempt to assert authority and remind SpaceX that the air (and anything it touches) is their kingdom. If Musk doesn't toe the line and simply ignores them, they run the risk that other enterprising spacemongers will do the same and FAA's support for space regulation in Congress will slip. FAA's power can be rewritten at the stroke of a pen, and they want to nip that thinking in the bud.
Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 17 2021, @03:03PM
It's pretty obvious you're making it up as you go along.
Please try and build a rocket without any supporting buildings. If you can't and your rocket needs a building, then it needs to be suitable for purpose. Not to mention saving migrating birds that might be disturbed.