Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 21 2021, @10:48AM   Printer-friendly

U.S. seeks to speed rooftop solar growth with instant permits:

The Solar Automated Permit Processing (SolarAPP+) platform, developed by DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, will be an optional portal for local governments to process permit applications automatically.

Approvals typically take a week or more currently, and permit-related costs can account for about a third of installers' overall costs, DOE said. The software speeds the process up by standardizing requirements, streamlining the application and automating some approvals.

Administration officials said the software will help speed adoption of rooftop solar and achieve President Joe Biden's goal of decarbonizing the U.S. electricity grid by 2035, a key pillar of his plan to address climate change. DOE has said that solar energy will need to be installed at a pace as much as five times faster than it is today to realize that goal.

[...] The portal performs an automatic review of permit applications, approving eligible systems instantly. Complex or ineligible systems are re-routed for additional review.

Local governments will not have to pay for the portal, DOE said. DOE is challenging 125 mayors and local officials to sign up for the SolarAPP tool before the end of the summer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by khallow on Wednesday July 21 2021, @05:39PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 21 2021, @05:39PM (#1158802) Journal

    Better check that the "routine construction" is actually something that exists and not a fictional concept.

    I300k [seia.org] PV installations per year counts as routine construction.

    Funny how you think that price should trump safety and suggest building engineering is regulation just for the sake of regulation.

    What makes the old approach safer? My take is that a lot of these regulations backfire, either by creating distractions or opportunities for corruption.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 21 2021, @07:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 21 2021, @07:15PM (#1158866)

    Simple solution, have local taxes pay for the engineers to inspect projects for free. If safety is the goal then the community should make it as easy as possible without monetary barriers.