SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Robots might take our jobs, but maybe we need them to - Utah Business:
AI is no longer just the musings of sci-fi writers. AI is being implemented in automation technology to help with manual labor and other types of tasks. The technology is at a point where nearly every industry could implement it, and many already have. The question is no longer when will this technology exist, but what do we do now that it does?
[...] In 2019, 5,333 workers died on the job in America. The following year, Covid-19 changed the landscape of the workplace, bringing even higher levels of on-the-job risk to nearly every industry.
[...] According to OSHA, about 20 percent of workplace fatalities are in the construction industry. As automation technology advances, making it affordable for business owners to use is essential in order to protect laborers in the industry.
[...] Ben Wolff, CEO of Utah-based Sarcos Robotics, says, “there are significant labor shortages expected in almost every skilled labor industry over the next decade despite the increase in the availability of automation technologies. The US is expecting a 2.4 million worker shortage in manufacturing from 2018 through 2028, as well as a $1.6 trillion global labor productivity shortfall in the construction industry.”
Though a shifting labor market can be scary, human workers are not replaceable. Leading AI researcher, Andrew Ng, says, “despite all the hype and excitement about AI, it’s still extremely limited today relative to what human intelligence is.”
The good news for humans in the workplace is there will always be jobs that require some human support. Not only will there be plenty of manual labor jobs to go around for years to come, but robots will not be able to match human ingenuity anytime soon.
[...] Humans are unique in their creativity, and that creativity is not replaceable in the workplace. However, robots and automation machines will soon become invaluable as they support human workers in manual labor tasks, especially in dangerous environments.
According to Wolff: “Technologies that augment human workers performing manual labor, such as full-body, battery-powered industrial exoskeletons, have the potential to significantly optimize productivity, reduce the likelihood of occupational injuries, equalize the workforce by enabling more diversity, and potentially extend the longevity of workers’ careers when performing skilled labor jobs.”
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 23 2021, @06:25PM (1 child)
The problem is that a lot of what humans can do can already be matched by an intelligence imitation using pattern recognition.
The imitations will get exponentially more powerful hardware to reach slightly higher levels of accuracy, and the profits will fund the parallel development of actual artificial intelligence. Workers will be put in the ground with all the dead bees.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 23 2021, @08:14PM
Only where some percentage of wildly wrong misrecognition is acceptable.
Otherwise, you still need a human checking the recognizer's output.
The tech we have now, can be quite useful for assisting a human: letting machine do the menial work, and checking its output to catch idiotic mistakes, is more productive if the rate of mistakes is low enough. But it is capable of replacing a human only where its inevitable idiotic mistakes do not matter (much): i.e. entertainment, fruit/vegetable sorting, and suchlike.