The New York Times published an interesting story about the fears of the current FBI director:
The director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, said Thursday that federal laws should be changed to require telecommunications companies to give law enforcement agencies access to the encrypted communications of individuals suspected of crimes.
... Mr. Comey warned that crimes could go unsolved if law enforcement officers cannot gain access to information that technology companies like Apple and Google are protecting using increasingly sophisticated encryption technology.
“Unfortunately, the law hasn’t kept pace with technology, and this disconnect has created a significant public safety problem,” he said.
Mr. Comey said that he was hoping to spur Congress to update the 20-year-old Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which does not require companies to give law enforcement direct access to individuals’ communications.
The F.B.I. has long had concerns about devices “going dark” — when technology becomes so sophisticated that the authorities cannot gain access to them. But now, Mr. Comey is warning that the new encryption technology has evolved to the point that it could adversely affect crime solving.
The kicker is this line:
“Those charged with protecting our people aren’t always able to access the evidence we need to prosecute crime and prevent terrorism, even with lawful authority."
Of course, it should be no surprise to the FBI why so many people are going "dark" and using things like Tails. For decades, the government has proven time and again that it can't be trusted to act lawfully and constitutionally. The FBI is responsible for more than its share of that. So naturally those who can are going to take steps to protect their privacy and Apple and Google, among others, are simply responding to that demand.
(Score: 2, Informative) by Horse With Stripes on Friday October 17 2014, @12:07PM
The government has very much kept up with technology.
You mean all the warrantless wiretaps, et al, that the TLAs have been doing for years (and that were confirmed by Snowden and others)? That doesn't count because they did that in secret and we aren't supposed to know they have that cutting edge technology.
(Score: 2) by mendax on Saturday October 18 2014, @12:26AM
If you were to read James Bamford's "The NSA and Me" [firstlook.org] (which happens to be a submission that has been languishing in the queue for a while), you would have seen that the government was slow to address the growth of the Internet. It was only after 9/11 that it started taking it seriously. Read the article; it's very good.
(The editors ought to post the submission as well once they've removed the commercial.)
It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.