Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 17 2014, @11:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the nothing-to-hide-vs-none-of-your-business dept.

The New York Times published an interesting story about the fears of the current FBI director:

The director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, said Thursday that federal laws should be changed to require telecommunications companies to give law enforcement agencies access to the encrypted communications of individuals suspected of crimes.

... Mr. Comey warned that crimes could go unsolved if law enforcement officers cannot gain access to information that technology companies like Apple and Google are protecting using increasingly sophisticated encryption technology.

“Unfortunately, the law hasn’t kept pace with technology, and this disconnect has created a significant public safety problem,” he said.

Mr. Comey said that he was hoping to spur Congress to update the 20-year-old Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which does not require companies to give law enforcement direct access to individuals’ communications.

The F.B.I. has long had concerns about devices “going dark” — when technology becomes so sophisticated that the authorities cannot gain access to them. But now, Mr. Comey is warning that the new encryption technology has evolved to the point that it could adversely affect crime solving.

The kicker is this line:

“Those charged with protecting our people aren’t always able to access the evidence we need to prosecute crime and prevent terrorism, even with lawful authority."

Of course, it should be no surprise to the FBI why so many people are going "dark" and using things like Tails. For decades, the government has proven time and again that it can't be trusted to act lawfully and constitutionally. The FBI is responsible for more than its share of that. So naturally those who can are going to take steps to protect their privacy and Apple and Google, among others, are simply responding to that demand.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by jcross on Friday October 17 2014, @08:25PM

    by jcross (4009) on Friday October 17 2014, @08:25PM (#107141)

    Holy smokes, mod parent insightful! I had never considered that they might be making a big stink to lure us into a false sense of security. It's the perfect way to convince everyone that they are safe, as long as the TLAs can keep it secret that they have a backdoor. Kind of similar to how the Allies played the Enigma crack in WWII.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 18 2014, @05:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 18 2014, @05:27AM (#107272)
    This is the real case.

    It makes the phone makers look like the good guys. And they sell more phones. Faster.

    While those platforms are easily looked thru.

    Everyone wins.

    Well. The people kind of get fucked. But that was going to happen anyway.
    This way more money gets made. Faster.