Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Friday July 30 2021, @03:06PM   Printer-friendly

No Antenna Could Survive Europa's Brutal, Radioactive Environment—Until Now

Ultimately, when NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), where I am a senior antenna engineer, began to seriously consider a Europa lander mission, we realized that the antenna was the limiting factor. The antenna needs to maintain a direct-to-Earth link across more than 550 million miles (900 million km) when Earth and Jupiter are at their point of greatest separation. The antenna must be radiation-hardened enough to survive an onslaught of ionizing particles from Jupiter, and it cannot be so heavy or so large that it would imperil the lander during takeoff and landing. One colleague, when we laid out the challenge in front of us, called it impossible. We built such an antenna anyway—and although it was designed for Europa, it is a revolutionary enough design that we're already successfully implementing it in future missions for other destinations in the solar system.

[...] I've mentioned previously that the antenna will need to transmit signals up to 900 million km. As a general rule, less efficient antennas need a larger surface area to transmit farther. But as the lander won't have an orbiter overhead with a large relay antenna, and it won't be big enough itself for a large antenna, it needs a small antenna with a transmission efficiency of 80 percent or higher—much more efficient than most space-bound antennas.

So, to reiterate the challenge: The antenna cannot be large, because then the lander will be too heavy. It cannot be inefficient for the same reason, because requiring more power would necessitate bulky power systems instead. And it needs to survive exposure to a brutal amount of radiation from Jupiter. This last point requires that the antenna must be mostly, if not entirely, made out of metal, because metals are more resistant to ionizing radiation.

The antenna we ultimately developed depends on a key innovation: The antenna is made up of circularly polarized, aluminum-only unit cells—more on this in a moment—that can each send and receive on X-band frequencies (specifically, 7.145 to 7.19 gigahertz for the uplink and 8.4 to 8.45 GHz for the downlink). The entire antenna is an array of these unit cells, 32 on a side or 1,024 in total. The antenna is 32.5 by 32.5 inches (82.5 by 82.5 centimeters), allowing it to fit on top of a modestly sized lander, and it can achieve a downlink rate to Earth of 33 kilobits per second at 80 percent efficiency.

By way of comparison, consider that the V.34bis standard (which allowed a top speed of up to 33.6 kbit/s bidirectional data transfer over phone lines) was finalized and issued in February of 1998. It was in September 1998 that the first draft of V.90 was announced and which finally enabled faster speeds. See the extensive history of modems on Wikipedia.

It bears noting that landlines presented much less of a challenge to communications than what would be experienced by the lander. Especially since light (or a radio wave) takes up to 50 minutes to get from Earth to Jupiter!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 30 2021, @06:14PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 30 2021, @06:14PM (#1161428)

    But other than being about the same speed, not that comparable. Modems in the 80s (1200-9600 baud) were limited by signal processing, but by the 90s (especially at the 33.6 rate) it was more about not frying the telephone equipment. Ethernet over similar wiring was already at 100 megabits (albeit with a shorter range).

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 30 2021, @11:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 30 2021, @11:27PM (#1161528)

    There was no risk of damaging the telephone equipment despite the garbage AT&T spewed about it*. The old analog telephone network was bandwidth limited by crappy amplifiers to 33.6k or lower. The digital telephone backbone of the late 90's was standardized at 56k so that is the fastest possible speed over 'modern' POTS, but due to clocking issues analog modems are still limited to transmitting at 48k. This is why the last generation of telephone modems were 56k down and 48k up and required hardware support from both the ISP and the phone company.

    *Back when acoustic modems were your only option because AT&T phones were hard wired and using your own telephone equipment was illegal.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 31 2021, @03:33AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 31 2021, @03:33AM (#1161610)

    Maybe it will run FidoNet? And other software optimized for modem speeds...