Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday August 18 2021, @02:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the things-getting-untidy-up-there dept.

Space collision: Chinese satellite got whacked by hunk of Russian rocket in March:

In March, the U.S. Space Force's 18th Space Control Squadron (18SPCS) reported the breakup of Yunhai 1-02, a Chinese military satellite that launched in September 2019. It was unclear at the time whether the spacecraft had suffered some sort of failure — an explosion in its propulsion system, perhaps — or if it had collided with something in orbit.

We now know that the latter explanation is correct, thanks to some sleuthing by astrophysicist and satellite tracker Jonathan McDowell, who's based at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

On Saturday (Aug. 14), McDowell spotted an update in the Space-Track.org catalog, which the 18SPCS makes available to registered users. The update included "a note for object 48078, 1996-051Q: 'Collided with satellite.' This is a new kind of comment entry — haven't seen such a comment for any other satellites before," McDowell tweeted on Saturday.

He dove into the tracking data to learn more. McDowell found that Object 48078 is a small piece of space junk — likely a piece of debris between 4 inches and 20 inches wide (10 to 50 centimeters) — from the Zenit-2 rocket that launched Russia's Tselina-2 spy satellite in September 1996. Eight pieces of debris originating from that rocket have been tracked over the years, he said, but Object 48078 has just a single set of orbital data, which was collected in March of this year.

"I conclude that they probably only spotted it in the data after it collided with something, and that's why there's only one set of orbital data. So the collision probably happened shortly after the epoch of the orbit. What did it hit?" McDowell wrote in another Saturday tweet.

Yunhai 1-02, which broke up on March 18, was "the obvious candidate," he added — and the data showed that it was indeed the victim. Yunhai 1-02 and Object 48078 passed within 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) of each other — within the margin of error of the tracking system — at 3:41 a.m. EDT (0741 GMT) on March 18, "exactly when 18SPCS reports Yunhai broke up," McDowell wrote in another tweet.

Thirty-seven debris objects spawned by the smashup have been detected to date, and there are likely others that remain untracked, he added.

Despite the damage, Yunhai 1-02 apparently survived the violent encounter, which occurred at an altitude of 485 miles (780 kilometers). Amateur radio trackers have continued to detect signals from the satellite, McDowell said, though it's unclear if Yunhai 1-02 can still do the job it was built to perform (whatever that may be).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 18 2021, @06:33PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 18 2021, @06:33PM (#1168240)

    The Russian leadership is off the rails. We are pretending it's not happening. Afghanistan too. I, for one, welcome our new terrorist failed states.

  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday August 19 2021, @04:05PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday August 19 2021, @04:05PM (#1168545)

    If we don't want failed states, we shouldn't build them. Russia's a different thing, but we won the war in Afghanistan within 18 months. The stated goal of the invasion was to eliminate Al Qaeda's safe harbor, and if we had left after accomplishing that, even if the Taliban had immediately regained control it's very unlikely they would have invited a second invasion by permitting Al Qaeda to return.

    After that point it was all mission creep, charity for military contractors, peace keeping, and "nation building". Unfortunately the US idea of "nation building" seems to be "Keep them weak and dependent on our goodwill for their continued existence", and it worked wonderfully - the nation fell to the insurgents before we even finished pulling out. Had we wanted them to be able to stand on their own there's a LOT of things we could have done differently (starting with, having US troops lend aid to the local security forces, rather than leading them and training them to be dependent on US technology and intelligence resources), but that would have put them on a course to have no need for us, and thus no need to do what we wanted.

    So long as the US is engaged in "nation building", a.k.a. "US empire building", we're just going to keep seeing more such stories.