Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday October 19 2014, @11:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the protecting-us-from-ourselves? dept.

Today, the White House announced a pause in a specific type of research on viruses. Rather than being a response to the recent Ebola infections, this dates back to events that began in 2011 ( http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/02/study-of-deadly-flu-sparks-debate-amidst-fears-of-new-pandemic/ ). Back then, researchers who were studying the bird flu put it through a series of lab procedures that ended with a flu virus that could readily infect mammals. Some members of the scientific community considered this work irresponsible, as the resulting virus could, again, potentially infect humans.

Similar research and a debate over its value and threat have continued. Now, however, the Obama administration decided to put it on hold. Prompted by several recent biosafety lapses (including the discovery of old smallpox samples at the National Institutes of Health), the government will temporarily stop funding for these projects. During the pause, the government will organize a "deliberative process" ( http://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/gain-of-function.pdf ) that will consider the value of the research and the appropriate safety precautions that will need to be followed if it's done. The review will be run by a combination of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity and the National Academies of Science.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/10/us-announces-pause-in-funding-for-changing-the-species-a-virus-targets/

[Announcement]; http://m.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/10/17/doing-diligence-assess-risks-and-benefits-life-sciences-gain-function-research

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday October 20 2014, @04:46AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Monday October 20 2014, @04:46AM (#107715) Journal

    I think the point was that to do this with an intent to weaponize is criminal. Doing it with an intent to understand viral mutation, while noble and scientific and all, tends to make the weaponization easier and inevitable. And as for protocols, seems like this is a species-wide problem. I do not recall ever reading or hearing that Murphy's Law was specific to one particular culture. And if any culture should be immune to such things, it would be the Germans and the Japanese. They have both had well know and public failures in the recent past.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2