Christopher Ingraham writes in the Washington Post that many countries are taking a close look at what's happening in Colorado and Washington state to learn lessons that can be applied to their own situations and so far, the news coming out of Colorado and Washington is overwhelmingly positive. Dire consequences predicted by reform opponents have failed to materialize. If anything, societal and economic indicators are moving in a positive direction post-legalization. Colorado marijuana tax revenues for fiscal year 2014-2015 are on track to surpass projections.
Lisa Sanchez, a program manager at México Unido Contra la Delincuencia, a Mexican non-profit devoted to promoting "security, legality and justice", underscored how legalization efforts in the U.S. are having powerful ripple effects across the globe: events in Colorado and Washington have "created political space for Latin American countries to have a real debate [about drug policy]". She noted that motivations for reform in Latin America are somewhat different than U.S. motivations - one main driver is a need to address the epidemic of violence on those countries that is fuelled directly by prohibitionist drug war policies. Mexico's president has given signs he's open to changes in that country's marijuana laws to help combat cartel violence. Sandeep Chawla, former deputy director of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, notes that one of the main obstacles to meaningful reform is layers of entrenched drug control bureaucracies at the international and national levels - just in the U.S., think of the DEA, ONDCP and NIDA, among others - for whom a relaxation of drug control laws represents an undermining of their reason for existence: "if you create a bureaucracy to solve a particular problem, when the problem is solved that bureaucracy is out of a job".
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday October 21 2014, @05:54PM
Alcohol in the United States directly kills 88,000 people a year. In Europe that same number is 200,000. Alcohol kills between 3 and 8 times as many people in any given country as gun violence. I would call that a serious dispute to the claim "Alcohol Legalization Makes World a Better Place"
You assume prohibition resulted in the reduction of alcohol consumption. It didn't.
Although consumption of alcohol fell at the beginning of Prohibition, it subsequently increased. Alcohol became moredangerous to consume; crime increased and became "organized"; the court and prison systems were stretched to thebreaking point; and corruption of public officials was rampant. No measurable gains were made in productivity orreduced absenteeism. Prohibition removed a significant source of tax revenue and greatly increased governmentspending. It led many drinkers to switch to opium, marijuana, patent medicines, cocaine, and other dangeroussubstances that they would have been unlikely to encounter in the absence of Prohibition.
Reference [cato.org]