Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday September 03 2021, @06:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the just-a-little-RISCy dept.

Chip world veterans gather to design customizable, chiplet-based RISC-V server chips

A Silicon Valley startup is stepping out of stealth mode today, publicly vowing to supply high-performance data-center-class RISC-V processors.

Ventana Micro Systems said since its founding in 2018 it has secured $53m in funding in series A and B rounds, the latter of which totaled $38m and was led by Marvell founders Sehat Sutardja and Weili Dai.

It is hoped the first samples of its 64-bit RISC-V processors will be shared with customers in the second half of next year, and ship in volume in the first half of 2023. It's worth remembering that big biz rarely significantly commits to using someone's silicon until it reaches second generation; the first generation is mostly for evaluation of the platform, which is where Ventana is at right now.

The processors, CEO and cofounder Balaji Baktha explained to us, will use a chiplet approach, as seen with AMD and lately Intel. That is to say, each chip will contain a number of discrete dies – some with CPU cores, some with custom acceleration, and others with IO and memory interfaces – interconnected within a single package.

[...] Ventana's compute dies each feature 16 RISC-V cores. Baktha said these out-of-order, four-wide superscalar cores should outperform RV64 rivals and at least match Arm's Neoverse data-center-class CPUs.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 08 2021, @03:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 08 2021, @03:31PM (#1175896)

    And the Pine series stuff is split between Allwinner and Rockchip cores, neither of which have been exceptionally well documented or open source friendly, although perhaps still better than Broadcom.

    There hasn't really been an 'open architecture' since the PC clone era of the 1990s. I would love to see a replacement, but so far we haven't had it.