Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by requerdanos on Sunday September 05 2021, @06:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the stifle-opposition-quash-free-speech-and-muzzle-expression dept.

Internet shutdowns by governments have 'proliferated at a truly alarming pace':

The number of government-led internet shutdowns has exploded over the last decade as states seek to stifle dissent and protest by limiting citizens' access to the web.

Nearly 850 intentional shutdowns have been recorded over the past 10 years by nonprofit Access Now's Shutdown Tracker Optimization Project (STOP), and although the group acknowledges that data on incidents before 2016 is "patchy," some 768 of these shutdowns took place in the last five years. There were 213 shutdowns in 2019 alone, with this figure ticking down to 155 in 2020 as the world adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic (which delayed elections and led to lockdowns that kept populations at home more often). And already in the first five months of 2021 there have been 50 shutdowns across 21 countries.

"Since we began tracking government-initiated internet shutdowns, their use has proliferated at a truly alarming pace," Access Now's Felicia Anthonio, campaigner and #KeepItOn lead, said in a new report on the issue in The Current, a publication of Google's internet thinktank Jigsaw. "As governments across the globe learn this authoritarian tactic from each other, it has moved from the fringes to become a common method many authorities use to stifle opposition, quash free speech and muzzle expression."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Monday September 06 2021, @02:04PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) on Monday September 06 2021, @02:04PM (#1174948) Journal

    What i'm saying is that Snowden showed us that there are well funded agencies in the US that are QUITE willing to break the law in order to get what they want, sometimes with the backing of the President and others high up in the 'hierarchy' of the US.

    Stopping internet coverage: is it that far from holding people without access to an attorney or any form of justice (Guantonamo Bay) and declaring people who do the morally right thing as terrorists and force them to flee their home country to escape a possible kangaroo court and prison?

    I. don't. think. so.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Opportunist on Monday September 06 2021, @03:14PM

    by Opportunist (5545) on Monday September 06 2021, @03:14PM (#1174972)

    Yes. The difference is that nobody gives half a fuck about the people in Gitmo. But they do care about their cat videos.

    Yes, that shouldn't be. But that's how it is.