SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the stifle-opposition-quash-free-speech-and-muzzle-expression dept.
Internet shutdowns by governments have 'proliferated at a truly alarming pace':
The number of government-led internet shutdowns has exploded over the last decade as states seek to stifle dissent and protest by limiting citizens' access to the web.
Nearly 850 intentional shutdowns have been recorded over the past 10 years by nonprofit Access Now's Shutdown Tracker Optimization Project (STOP), and although the group acknowledges that data on incidents before 2016 is "patchy," some 768 of these shutdowns took place in the last five years. There were 213 shutdowns in 2019 alone, with this figure ticking down to 155 in 2020 as the world adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic (which delayed elections and led to lockdowns that kept populations at home more often). And already in the first five months of 2021 there have been 50 shutdowns across 21 countries.
"Since we began tracking government-initiated internet shutdowns, their use has proliferated at a truly alarming pace," Access Now's Felicia Anthonio, campaigner and #KeepItOn lead, said in a new report on the issue in The Current, a publication of Google's internet thinktank Jigsaw. "As governments across the globe learn this authoritarian tactic from each other, it has moved from the fringes to become a common method many authorities use to stifle opposition, quash free speech and muzzle expression."
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 06 2021, @10:25PM (4 children)
Then your internet is not a replacement for the current internet and the two will need to coexist, because your internet is inherently much poorer in regards with the possible interactions, no e-banking/e-commerce as the first two.
I always rely on trusting a DNS to resolve the name of my bank. If you replace it with certificates (or shared secret or whatever crypto handwaving), I'll need to store an immensity of them and deal with their expiration.
Ummm... yeah. Try explaining to me a decentralized ebay next.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 06 2021, @10:38PM (3 children)
Wait ... waitwaitwait.
You think the current internet solves that? For real? For realsie-reals?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'm sorry. That was so rude of me. Heehee. I mean, unforgivable. Hahahha.
Let me put it this way: if you trust the current DNS infrastructure, then you should be just peachy-keen a-OK FINE with a distributed approach to naming with a foundation of identifiable nexus servers.
But you do you, I guess.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 06 2021, @10:44PM (2 children)
Read more on trust [schneier.com]. It's always a compromise.
Move the balance towards paranoids and only the paranoids will use your internet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 06 2021, @11:33PM (1 child)
Compromise is available. For folks like you, trusting what you get back from a regular query is just fine, now roll over and go back to sleep while Big Brother's Little Sister rubs your back.
For the paranoid, out-of-band verification, multi-factor authentication and all that stuff is still there.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 06 2021, @11:58PM
I survived a communist regime and its secret police for 25+ years.
Use your technology and stick out as a sore thumb, just prepare yourself for a $5 wrench attack on your or your close contacts' multifactor authentication. Also keep in mind the situation is dynamic and can change in any minute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford