Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Here, this will settle your stupid gun control fight!

Journal by fustakrakich

Not gonna spoil it. You'll have to watch, or just move along

Here, this will settle your stupid gun control fight! | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 32 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 14 2021, @03:21PM (5 children)

    by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 14 2021, @03:21PM (#1177718) Journal

    So then why do you ignore the real issue of bad guys having guns and not actually want to address it?

    Because nobody has 1) a reliable way to determine who the bad guys are, and 2) no compelling reason to address that.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Tuesday September 14 2021, @04:48PM (4 children)

    by DannyB (5839) on Tuesday September 14 2021, @04:48PM (#1177756) Journal

    There is no perfect way to address who the bad guys are. Some are obvious. Others are not.

    As for no compelling reason, we will just have to disagree. You seem to be blind to the problem. You just don't want to see it for political reasons. I don't have a problem with good people having guns. I'm willing to work for a policy that works for a majority of people on a divisive issue.

    The reason the issue is divisive is because we have a problem. But you refuse to even acknowledge it. Not a good point to have any meaningful discussion.

    --
    If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 14 2021, @07:05PM (3 children)

      by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 14 2021, @07:05PM (#1177804) Journal
      No, you merely claim we have a problem serious enough to ban normal citizen access/ownership of firearms. For example, who are these nebulous bad people who shouldn't have access to firearms and how do you figure that out?

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday September 14 2021, @08:48PM (2 children)

        by DannyB (5839) on Tuesday September 14 2021, @08:48PM (#1177857) Journal

        The normal citizens are not the ones who should be banned from access to firearms. You misrepresent what I am saying.

        There are bad people. Some are obvious. Others are not so obvious.

        An example. A person who has brandished firearms at others, and has been court ordered to have no contact with someone and take an anger management class might be an obvious example of someone who probably should not have a firearm.

        Everyone else around that person probably should have a firearm.

        --
        If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15 2021, @01:05AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 15 2021, @01:05AM (#1177917)

          Brandishing is already a felony, those people will already be barred from legally owning weapons...

          • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Wednesday September 15 2021, @02:36AM

            by khallow (3766) on Wednesday September 15 2021, @02:36AM (#1177947) Journal
            This. Though there's some states that allow some felons to own firearms, courts can prohibit people like this from owning firearms.