Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Thursday September 30 2021, @01:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the its-good-to-know-where-you-are dept.

Researchers use Starlink satellites to pinpoint location, similar to GPS:

Researchers track six satellites to get location with accuracy of eight meters.

Signals from SpaceX Starlink broadband satellites can be used to pinpoint locations on Earth to within eight meters of accuracy, engineering researchers reported in a new peer-reviewed paper. Their report is part of a growing body of research into using signals from low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites for navigation, similar to how GPS works.

Kassas said his "team has used similar techniques with other low-Earth orbit satellite constellations, but with less accuracy, pinpointing locations within about 23 meters," according to the Ohio State News article.

SpaceX satellite signals used like GPS to pinpoint location on Earth

Researchers find novel way to use Starlink system

Engineering researchers have developed a method to use signals broadcast by Starlink internet service satellites to accurately locate a position here on Earth, much like GPS does. It is the first time the Starlink system has been harnessed by researchers outside SpaceX for navigation.

[....] Their findings, shared today (Sept. 22, 2021) at the Institute of Navigation GNSS annual meeting in St. Louis, may provide a promising alternative to GPS. Their results will be published in the upcoming issue of the journal IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

The researchers did not need assistance from SpaceX to use the satellite signals, and they emphasized that they had no access to the actual data being sent through the satellites – only to information related to the satellite’s location and movement.

Foreign adversaries who cannot launch their own global navigation satellites might find this as a "poor man's" alternative.

Journal Reference:
Zaher Zak Kassas, Joe Khalife, Mohammad Neinavaie. The First Carrier Phase Tracking and Positioning Results with Starlink LEO Satellite Signals, IEEE (DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3113880)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by dwilson on Thursday September 30 2021, @08:26PM

    by dwilson (2599) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 30 2021, @08:26PM (#1183187) Journal

    You know what is much more gooder than a kill switch?

    A way to tweak signals so that the satellites deliberately mislead an adversary's position information.

    They tried that [wikipedia.org]. Unsurprisingly, the market worked around it. DGPS reached such a high level of accuracy that SA was recognized as being pointless, and was turned off.

    I use free, non-subscription DGPS systems regularly, and they're accurate to within a foot or less, though I admit it tends to drift occasionally and requires monitoring and manual intervention at times. I even use a subscription DGPS service, and it's accurate to within a few inches. It 'Just works'.

    I'm not saying it things couldn't be 'tweaked', as you put it, in such a way as to render an introduced error non-correctable, but at this point what's the point? We've got GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, with even more commercial satellites and land-based systems augmenting those, which we collectively call DGPS.

    Why worry about an 'enemy' using a Starlink positioner against you? They've got so many other options.

    --
    - D
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4