Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 01 2021, @05:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the glad-we-are-not-hosted-down-under dept.

CNN shut down its Facebook page in Australia after court liability ruling:

CNN shut down its Facebook page in Australia on Wednesday, after an Australian court ruled that media outlets are liable for defamatory user-generated comments.

[...] The deteriorating effects of the court's ruling on online speech in Australia serve as a warning of what's to come if U.S. lawmakers succeed in their efforts to weakening protections against such legal decisions in the United States.

[...] The court's ruling previews the grim future in store if U.S. politicians get their way and dismantle Section 230, the keystone U.S. law that shields websites from liability over user-generated content. Without it, social media platforms and any other website with user-generated content—especially those without Facebook's deep pockets—would likely die. Both Republicans and Democrats, President Joe Biden included, would like it dismantled.

Should the person doing the defaming be liable, or the owner of the page the defamation is posted on be liable?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 02 2021, @02:36AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 02 2021, @02:36AM (#1183538)

    in much the same way as a newspaper is responsible for the content of the "Letters to the Editor" column

    No, it's not the same way a newspaper is responsible for the "Letters to the Editor" column. The publishing platform of Facebook comments is Facebook, not CNN. This would be akin to the Washington Post running a section called "Letters to the Editor of Le Monde", and then Le Monde being held liable for the content of the letters published in the Washington Post.

    So it's more like "you are responsible by association for what any other media outlet publishes under your name".

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 02 2021, @07:15AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 02 2021, @07:15AM (#1183590)

    While I could certainly see holding Fecebook responsible as well if they control content, the question would be; Does CNN have control over what shows up on their page?
    The question of control is what is important. It is (usually) the publisher who gets sued, not the guy running the printing press.