Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday March 05 2014, @07:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the unplugging-the-network-cable dept.

Appalbarry writes:

"Microsoft is about to abandon Windows XP to the wolves. Fair enough it's ancient. However, there are still going to be a lot of XP boxes out there, and a fair number of them are unlikely to ever get upgraded until the hardware dies.

My question is: what's available to help make this old OS stay reasonably secure and safe for the people who can't or won't abandon it?

Over the years I've been through Central Point Antivirus, Norton, McAfee, AVG, stuff like Zone Alarm, and of course the various Microsoft anti-malware offerings. But since moving over to Linux I really haven't kept up on the wild and wonderful world of Windows security tools.

Suggestions?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by hendrikboom on Wednesday March 05 2014, @02:56PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 05 2014, @02:56PM (#11345) Homepage Journal

    Using a VM under Linux seems to be the way to go if the legacy software needs to be net-connected. You can keep backups of the entire VM within Linux, so it will be possible to back out of trouble if it should occur.

    Which brings up some follow-up questions.

    (1) Which VM is appropriate? safe? efficient?

    (2) Is there a VM that can take an existing Windows system and virtualise it, or is it necessary to start with a fresh XP install on the virtual machine?

    -- hendrik

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by dilbert on Wednesday March 05 2014, @04:31PM

    by dilbert (444) on Wednesday March 05 2014, @04:31PM (#11385)
    1. I personally prefer VirtualBox to VMware Workstation.
    2. A quick search turned up this [addictivetips.com]. While the article focuses on using the virtual disk in Workstation, it should work in VirtualBox too.
    • (Score: 1) by hendrikboom on Monday March 10 2014, @06:18PM

      by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 10 2014, @06:18PM (#14153) Homepage Journal

      Are both Virtualbox and VMware proprietary? If so, I may just end up meeting the same fate with them as with Windows XP now. And do they run under Linux?

      • (Score: 1) by dilbert on Monday March 10 2014, @06:37PM

        by dilbert (444) on Monday March 10 2014, @06:37PM (#14167)
        VirtualBox is open source and available under a GPLv2 license. Oracle does have a proprietary 'Extension Pack' which enables things like USB support, but it's not required.

        Excerpted from https://www.virtualbox.org/ [virtualbox.org]:

        VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

        VMware offers VMware Player at no charge, but it's not open source. VMware Workstation is not available at no charge, but had additional features above VMware Player.

      • (Score: 1) by dilbert on Monday March 10 2014, @06:42PM

        by dilbert (444) on Monday March 10 2014, @06:42PM (#14171)

        And do they run under Linux?

        Both VirtualBox and Workstation are both supported on Linux.

        At home I use VirtualBox on Linux every day without any issues.

        I've used Workstation at work on a Win7 machine, but I've never used Workstation on a Linux box.