SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Back in March I asked you guys if I should put SSL on my mcgrewbooks.com site, since it appeared that it would raise my hosting cost by $25 a year, and there was no technical reason to have it; there is no personal information collected whatever.
I gave a lot of thought to the comments for months, and yesterday decided to go ahead and spend the money; I just put three grand on my mortgage principal. So I went to R4L’s web site to find where I could add SSL. I couldn’t find it.
However, their help is actually a Canadian who helps through text chat, who informed me that paid hosting came with SSL, I simply had to turn it on.
Well, it wasn’t that simple, as they’re upgrading their tools and I ran across a couple of 404s. But I finally found the correct widget to click, so the unnecessary lock is no longer broken.
My other site still has a broken lock, but it’s a “free” site. Registration there is $15, but you get ten megabytes of hosting. Those are the kind of site that an extra $25 buys SSL, and you might as well pay for hosting. It isn’t much more, and it isn’t hard to fill ten megs. Almost all of the images at mcgrew.info are either on Wikipedia (which reminds me, I should donate again) or mcgrewbooks.
I wish I would have known that five years ago! But I’m still more than happy with R4L.
Since R4L is Canadian, whose internet laws apply? America’s? Canada’s? Both? Neither?
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Thursday October 14 2021, @05:37PM
Frankly I think https is way overblown (like so many things these days). The problem is: more and more browsers are refusing to render an http page without popping up a warning about how insecure the site is. That interstitial warning is causing many people to steer clear of a perfectly okay website. But the browser has no way of knowing it's just a site to be read from, not one where you send information to (web forms, etc.). So that's driving the necessity for https.