Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday October 23 2021, @11:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the quashed-by-Big-Tentacle dept.

Vice

Japanese police on Monday arrested a 43-year-old man for using artificial intelligence to effectively unblur pixelated porn videos, in the first criminal case in the country involving the exploitative use of the powerful technology.

Masayuki Nakamoto, who runs his own website in the southern prefecture of Hyogo, lifted images of porn stars from Japanese adult videos and doctored them with the same method used to create realistic face swaps in deepfake videos.

But instead of changing faces, Nakamoto used machine learning software to reconstruct the blurred parts of the video based on a large set of uncensored nudes and sold the content online. Penises and vaginas are pixelated in Japanese porn because an obscenity law forbids the explicit depictions of genitalia.

Nakamoto reportedly made about 11 million yen ($96,000) by selling over 10,000 manipulated videos, though he was arrested specifically for selling 10 fake photos at about 2,300 yen ($20) each.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:49AM (8 children)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:49AM (#1189979)

    I wonder if this will bring about a different raft [youtu.be] of copyright infringement considerations.

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:49AM (7 children)

      by tangomargarine (667) on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:49AM (#1190004)

      That's what I was thinking--since he was selling it, presumably without the rights to do so, it's clearly a copyright case before you even get to obscenity issues, right?

      Smells like somebody just wants to get something on the books in regard to deepfake law and is using this as an excuse.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sgleysti on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:08AM (6 children)

        by sgleysti (56) on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:08AM (#1190027)

        From the article

        Nakamoto pleaded guilty to charges of copyright violation and displaying obscene images and said he did it for money, according to NHK.

        Photo-realistic images created using AI are increasingly common and have raised many legal and ethical questions concerning privacy, sexual exploitation, copyright, and artistic expression.

        The weird thing to me is that there's so much free porn on the internet, I don't see the usefulness of this Japanese law requiring things to be blurred...

        • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:05PM (4 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:05PM (#1190068)

          It does control the porn involving Japanese people. If you want to watch Japanese getting it on, like this guy, you put up with a lot of blurred private parts.

          • (Score: 2, Troll) by Username on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:31PM (2 children)

            by Username (4557) on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:31PM (#1190085)

            More to the point, that rarity increases the value of japanese women, and encourages japanese men to seek sex from them in person. Why would a japanese man want a european woman when there is an ample supply of everything he could want from them available online, on demand. There is nothing left to be desired when you've seen all they have to offer.

            • (Score: 2) by looorg on Sunday October 24 2021, @04:08PM (1 child)

              by looorg (578) on Sunday October 24 2021, @04:08PM (#1190112)

              It doesn't appear to be working as the population keeps declining. Perhaps they need to add more pixels! Or there are other issues at play beyond the pixels.

              That said I don't really know why they went that pixel route to cover up the bits and bobs here and there. If it was just some kind of obscenity thing or if it was about morality or some "protection of the female form" (or whatever). If they had wanted to they could have just cut around it and never really showed it. Now it just looks weird with the extra pixel layer here and there showing up or being in print etc. They could have just done "softcore" porn all the way and shown mostly faces and have shots where genitals wasn't in view. That said perhaps one wonders about pornography in general if it really has to look like a medical examination, thanks no I don't need close up shots with that level of 5k detail of a bottom etc.

              • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday October 25 2021, @07:12AM

                by tangomargarine (667) on Monday October 25 2021, @07:12AM (#1190284)

                It doesn't appear to be working as the population keeps declining.

                Because I'm sure the rest of the world is as kooky as we are in the U.S. about abstinence-only education... /s

                That said I don't really know why they went that pixel route to cover up the bits and bobs here and there. If it was just some kind of obscenity thing or if it was about morality or some "protection of the female form"

                I remember looking this up recently, and supposedly it actually has to do with the U.S. occupation of Japan post-WWII. Since this was back in the 40s people were pretty uptight about this sort of thing, so it wound up in the Constitution and they've just never decided to change it since. Or something like that.

                If they had wanted to they could have just cut around it and never really showed it. Now it just looks weird with the extra pixel layer here and there showing up or being in print etc.

                Yeah, because a big, gaping black hole in the middle of the screen would look so natural? /s

                They could have just done "softcore" porn all the way and shown mostly faces and have shots where genitals wasn't in view.

                I'm filing this under my "if it were that easy they would've just fucking done it that way to begin with" file from my experience as a programmer. Presumably there's only so much of a market for softcore stuff; many people want to see the "harder" bits.

                --
                "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
          • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @07:20AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @07:20AM (#1190286)

            Personally there's just something about Japanese sex squeals that is off-putting. Or a heavy English accent, too.

            Fortune on submit page:

            A shapely CATHOLIC SCHOOLGIRL is FIDGETING inside my costume..

            P.S: What is this shit about double periods

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:04PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:04PM (#1190124)

          The weird thing to me is that there's so much free porn on the internet, I don't see the usefulness of this Japanese law requiring things to be blurred...

          Cultural protectionism. Otherwise the Japanese people will forget tentacles.

  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:55AM (6 children)

    by looorg (578) on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:55AM (#1189981)

    Was there not enough porn with all the bits showing around?

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by looorg on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:04AM (3 children)

      by looorg (578) on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:04AM (#1189984)

      But is it really uncensoring? If they deepfake in parts of the image those might not be the real bits, they could be but they might not be. It might as well just be fitting parts. It is not really removing the pixelation is it? Isnt it just inserting parts from other images, preferably from the same or similar people to cover it up. So it is more like painting it over to create new "realistic" looking images.

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:35AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:35AM (#1189991)

        It still violates the law, as even drawn fictional depictions of genitalia have to be censored.

      • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @04:00AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @04:00AM (#1190017)

        Oh no! Something in porn might be fake!

        • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Tuesday October 26 2021, @07:52AM

          by MostCynical (2589) on Tuesday October 26 2021, @07:52AM (#1190566) Journal

          in much "American" porn, it is usually the breasts.

          IMO, seeing a girl bounce up and down on some weird blob of blurry pixels is not really...edifying.

          --
          "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:12AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @02:12AM (#1189998)

      No wonder they have a dwindling population in Japan - nobody wants to deal with those sharp, pixelated (but legal!!) genitalia. Legal sex in Japan must be extremely painful.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:01PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:01PM (#1190091)

        Kamikazi sex.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:01AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:01AM (#1189983)

    Eventually there will be a browser plugin that will do it automatically.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:14AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:14AM (#1189988)

      Why spend the $20, your imagination has already filled in the pixelated parts.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:18AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:18AM (#1189990)

    They outta arrest the actresses for moaning like chipmunks - total buzzkill.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:11AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:11AM (#1190028)

      Suppose there was a porn video involving a Japanese porn actress getting arrested for moaning like a chipmunk in a porn video... would you get off on that?

      • (Score: 4, Funny) by Opportunist on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:05AM (1 child)

        by Opportunist (5545) on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:05AM (#1190039)

        Would you see George Wendt in a bean-eating movie?

        • (Score: 2) by Opportunist on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:06PM

          by Opportunist (5545) on Sunday October 24 2021, @12:06PM (#1190059)

          I'm frankly surprised to see someone around that's old enough to understand the joke and weird enough to actually remember the obscure reference.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @11:46AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @11:46AM (#1190308)

      Is there a list of JAV actresses who don't squeal? Is it a very short list?

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:35PM (#1190104)

    1.) What's the survival rate for COVID (minus co-morbidity factors/other medical issues present already in a person)?

    ANSWER = roughly 99++% across ALL age groups (or close to it)

    2.) GIVEN THAT FACT, then WHY TAKE AN UNPROVEN SHOT that's PROVEN it generates ALL THESE BAD CONDITIONS:

    pericarditis
    myocarditis
    NERVOUS "twitch" disorders (sp? gillian barre, huntington's disease like, etc.)
    PARALYSIS
    cancer
    sterility
    COVID RASH (huge blisters & "burnt" red skin that falls off etc.)
    brain aneurisms
    lung CLOTS

    (for the LAST 2? GET A D-DIMER TEST to help catch & stall BLOOD CLOTTING leading to them, catching it EARLY!)

    & more...

    ALL BASED ON FALSE POSITIVE RESULT GENERATING PCR TESTS per all the evidences I noted here on that note vs. your bs WHICH HELPED ME PROVE IT no less, lol https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=45332&page=1&cid=1185265#commentwrap [soylentnews.org]

    *** IMPORTANT/ADDITIONAL FACT:

    PCR tests DO NOT TEST FOR ANYTHING BUT DNA (double-helix) & what do viruses contain? RNA (single-helix) ONLY!

    (To which the CDC got rid of OLD TESTS (that also did false positives due to cycling turned up too high to panic sheeple into taking a CLOT SHOT) & NOW "new tests" are out? No thanks!)

    ---

    PCR test cycles TURNED UP TOO HIGH in cycling per Kary Mullis the NOBEL LAUREATE who was awarded the NOBEL PRIZE for that test (nobody knows it better than he - HE INVENTED IT) DID OCCUR & the fact "new tests" ARE out PROVES IT - but those that took the shot based on FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS I list above ARE IN DEEP SHIT (dead).

    A DOCUMENTARY that further illustrates the BS of the PCR test?

    COVIDLAND https://www.brighteon.com/97ba444b-d3fd-4774-8bed-e9ceb3844fec [brighteon.com]

    ( w/ FAUCI saying "anything over 33 cycles is not worth doing it higher" WHICH THEY DID DO, by testing way, Way, WAY over 33 cycles (so much so, things like a BANANA show "covid positive") to CHUMP YOU into taking the CLOTSHOT - period!)

    ---

    ELECTRON MICROSCOPY EXPERT Dr. Young SHOWS POISONOUS GRAPHENE IN VACCINES ALSO:

    https://www.brighteon.com/9e58bf44-05e7-4b71-97e5-b243f6cf890c [brighteon.com]

    FACT!

    ---

    Vaccine makers don't KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING (or do & want to kill you)!

    * AND, moreso when a PFizer scientist ADMITS natural immunity is better than taking the CLOTSHOTS (NDA he signed got him scared for it too, admitting it)

    https://www.brighteon.com/2aa6d13f-e0bb-4fd7-8f7a-fb36df5e0b18 [brighteon.com]

    ---

    Then, the WHO changes the DEFINITION of "pandemic" from NUMBER OF DEATHS vs. NUMBER OF CASES (which "The Wayback Machine" still has evidence of) to make a herd stampede in panic (herd of stupid sheeple) due to false positives from a BOGUS "test" per above, that ROPED DOPES IN as said "panicked sheeple herd" to take a shot that f's you up!

    ---

    E.G. All you have to REALLY "endure" is a flu like condition pretty much - e.g. My Mom's 84++ & SURVIVED IT (beating it in 7 days)!

    * YOUR "CURE" IS WORSE THAN THE DISEASE!

    (The proof is that when your body after vaxing LOSES its IMMUNE SYSTEM (see cytokines below in my ps) & MORE PEOPLE WOULD DIE in FLU SEASON (just starting now 10/2021) & THEY ARE NOW "right on schedule" per https://www.brighteon.com/6b1d70d0-d79d-4cdf-9385-d0a7726c46a1 [brighteon.com] )

    In fact, due to VARIANTS being produced by the vaxxinated? I'd say the VAX IS THE DISEASE (as it debilitates your immune system to ZERO efficacy eventually & YOU DIE...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Why fix something that's NOT BROKEN (your innate native immune system) UNTIL the vax damages your "killer T" cells proven just above (specifically T1 marker type that marks infestors via cytokines for leukocytes envelop & digestion removal (or possibly lymphocytes doing so also)) - especially vs. something that DOES NOT KILL YOU in 99++% of cases minus ANY OTHER "co-morbidities"? Additionally given that - WHY THE "BIG PUSH" to PUSH (like drug dealers do & in this case, "LEGAL" drug dealers) to put a vax in you that does NOT WORK as advertised in the 1st place?? LOOKUP Franc Zalewski and see EXACTLY why here https://www.brighteon.com/0ff2ee6a-413a-4e4e-b516-831eb394bc90 [brighteon.com] Where he shows SOMEKIND OF ORGANISM self-assembling made of carbon & aluminum floating around in VACCINATED FOLKS' BLOOD doing WHO KNOWS WHAT!... apk

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:20PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:20PM (#1190130)

    1.) What's the survival rate for COVID (minus co-morbidity factors/other medical issues present already in a person)?

    ANSWER = roughly 99++% across ALL age groups (or close to it)

    2.) GIVEN THAT FACT, then WHY TAKE AN UNPROVEN SHOT that's PROVEN it generates ALL THESE BAD CONDITIONS:

    pericarditis
    myocarditis
    NERVOUS "twitch" disorders (sp? gillian barre, huntington's disease like, etc.)
    PARALYSIS
    cancer
    sterility
    COVID RASH (huge blisters & "burnt" red skin that falls off etc.)
    brain aneurisms
    lung CLOTS

    (for the LAST 2? GET A D-DIMER TEST to help catch & stall BLOOD CLOTTING leading to them, catching it EARLY!)

    & more...

    ALL BASED ON FALSE POSITIVE RESULT GENERATING PCR TESTS per all the evidences I noted here on that note vs. your bs WHICH HELPED ME PROVE IT no less, lol https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=45332&page=1&cid=1185265#commentwrap [soylentnews.org]

    *** IMPORTANT/ADDITIONAL FACT:

    PCR tests DO NOT TEST FOR ANYTHING BUT DNA (double-helix) & what do viruses contain? RNA (single-helix) ONLY!

    (To which the CDC got rid of OLD TESTS (that also did false positives due to cycling turned up too high to panic sheeple into taking a CLOT SHOT) & NOW "new tests" are out? No thanks!)

    ---

    PCR test cycles TURNED UP TOO HIGH in cycling per Kary Mullis the NOBEL LAUREATE who was awarded the NOBEL PRIZE for that test (nobody knows it better than he - HE INVENTED IT) DID OCCUR & the fact "new tests" ARE out PROVES IT - but those that took the shot based on FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS I list above ARE IN DEEP SHIT (dead).

    A DOCUMENTARY that further illustrates the BS of the PCR test?

    COVIDLAND https://www.brighteon.com/97ba444b-d3fd-4774-8bed-e9ceb3844fec [brighteon.com]

    ( w/ FAUCI saying "anything over 33 cycles is not worth doing it higher" WHICH THEY DID DO, by testing way, Way, WAY over 33 cycles (so much so, things like a BANANA show "covid positive") to CHUMP YOU into taking the CLOTSHOT - period!)

    ---

    ELECTRON MICROSCOPY EXPERT Dr. Young SHOWS POISONOUS GRAPHENE IN VACCINES ALSO:

    https://www.brighteon.com/9e58bf44-05e7-4b71-97e5-b243f6cf890c [brighteon.com]

    FACT!

    ---

    Vaccine makers don't KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING (or do & want to kill you)!

    * AND, moreso when a PFizer scientist ADMITS natural immunity is better than taking the CLOTSHOTS (NDA he signed got him scared for it too, admitting it)

    https://www.brighteon.com/2aa6d13f-e0bb-4fd7-8f7a-fb36df5e0b18 [brighteon.com]

    ---

    Then, the WHO changes the DEFINITION of "pandemic" from NUMBER OF DEATHS vs. NUMBER OF CASES (which "The Wayback Machine" still has evidence of) to make a herd stampede in panic (herd of stupid sheeple) due to false positives from a BOGUS "test" per above, that ROPED DOPES IN as said "panicked sheeple herd" to take a shot that f's you up!

    ---

    E.G. All you have to REALLY "endure" is a flu like condition pretty much - e.g. My Mom's 84++ & SURVIVED IT (beating it in 7 days)!

    * YOUR "CURE" IS WORSE THAN THE DISEASE!

    (The proof is that when your body after vaxing LOSES its IMMUNE SYSTEM (see cytokines below in my ps) & MORE PEOPLE WOULD DIE in FLU SEASON (just starting now 10/2021) & THEY ARE NOW "right on schedule" per https://www.brighteon.com/6b1d70d0-d79d-4cdf-9385-d0a7726c46a1 [brighteon.com] )

    In fact, due to VARIANTS being produced by the vaxxinated? I'd say the VAX IS THE DISEASE (as it debilitates your immune system to ZERO efficacy eventually & YOU DIE...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Why fix something that's NOT BROKEN (your innate native immune system) UNTIL the vax damages your "killer T" cells proven just above (specifically T1 marker type that marks infestors via cytokines for leukocytes envelop & digestion removal (or possibly lymphocytes doing so also)) - especially vs. something that DOES NOT KILL YOU in 99++% of cases minus ANY OTHER "co-morbidities"? Additionally given that - WHY THE "BIG PUSH" to PUSH (like drug dealers do & in this case, "LEGAL" drug dealers) to put a vax in you that does NOT WORK as advertised in the 1st place?? LOOKUP Franc Zalewski and see EXACTLY why here https://www.brighteon.com/0ff2ee6a-413a-4e4e-b516-831eb394bc90 [brighteon.com] Where he shows SOMEKIND OF ORGANISM self-assembling made of carbon & aluminum floating around in VACCINATED FOLKS' BLOOD doing WHO KNOWS WHAT!... apk

  • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @10:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @10:23PM (#1190196)

    1.) What's the survival rate for COVID (minus co-morbidity factors/other medical issues present already in a person)?

    ANSWER = roughly 99++% across ALL age groups (or close to it)

    2.) GIVEN THAT FACT, then WHY TAKE AN UNPROVEN SHOT that's PROVEN it generates ALL THESE BAD CONDITIONS:

    pericarditis
    myocarditis
    NERVOUS "twitch" disorders (sp? gillian barre, huntington's disease like, etc.)
    PARALYSIS
    cancer
    sterility
    COVID RASH (huge blisters & "burnt" red skin that falls off etc.)
    brain aneurisms
    lung CLOTS

    (for the LAST 2? GET A D-DIMER TEST to help catch & stall BLOOD CLOTTING leading to them, catching it EARLY!)

    & more...

    ALL BASED ON FALSE POSITIVE RESULT GENERATING PCR TESTS per all the evidences I noted here on that note vs. your bs WHICH HELPED ME PROVE IT no less, lol https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=45332&page=1&cid=1185265#commentwrap [soylentnews.org]

    *** IMPORTANT/ADDITIONAL FACT:

    PCR tests DO NOT TEST FOR ANYTHING BUT DNA (double-helix) & what do viruses contain? RNA (single-helix) ONLY!

    (To which the CDC got rid of OLD TESTS (that also did false positives due to cycling turned up too high to panic sheeple into taking a CLOT SHOT) & NOW "new tests" are out? No thanks!)

    ---

    PCR test cycles TURNED UP TOO HIGH in cycling per Kary Mullis the NOBEL LAUREATE who was awarded the NOBEL PRIZE for that test (nobody knows it better than he - HE INVENTED IT) DID OCCUR & the fact "new tests" ARE out PROVES IT - but those that took the shot based on FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS I list above ARE IN DEEP SHIT (dead).

    A DOCUMENTARY that further illustrates the BS of the PCR test?

    COVIDLAND https://www.brighteon.com/97ba444b-d3fd-4774-8bed-e9ceb3844fec [brighteon.com]

    ( w/ FAUCI saying "anything over 33 cycles is not worth doing it higher" WHICH THEY DID DO, by testing way, Way, WAY over 33 cycles (so much so, things like a BANANA show "covid positive") to CHUMP YOU into taking the CLOTSHOT - period!)

    ---

    ELECTRON MICROSCOPY EXPERT Dr. Young SHOWS POISONOUS GRAPHENE IN VACCINES ALSO:

    https://www.brighteon.com/9e58bf44-05e7-4b71-97e5-b243f6cf890c [brighteon.com]

    FACT!

    IN FACT (pun intended) GRAPHENE OXIDE's in Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) + AstraZeneca:

    https://www.brighteon.com/6d8fcfd7-4811-4e64-90c9-bd5585b59ff5 [brighteon.com]

    AND, Guess what is a MAJOR CAUSE of myocarditis, clotting etc.? That's right: GRAPHENE OXIDE, "surprise, Surprise, SURPRISE" (not).

    ---

    Vaccine makers don't KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING (or do & want to kill you)!

    * AND, moreso when a PFizer scientist ADMITS natural immunity is better than taking the CLOTSHOTS (NDA he signed got him scared for it too, admitting it)

    https://www.brighteon.com/2aa6d13f-e0bb-4fd7-8f7a-fb36df5e0b18 [brighteon.com]

    ---

    Then, the WHO changes the DEFINITION of "pandemic" from NUMBER OF DEATHS vs. NUMBER OF CASES (which "The Wayback Machine" still has evidence of) to make a herd stampede in panic (herd of stupid sheeple) due to false positives from a BOGUS "test" per above, that ROPED DOPES IN as said "panicked sheeple herd" to take a shot that f's you up!

    ---

    E.G. All you have to REALLY "endure" is a flu like condition pretty much - e.g. My Mom's 84++ & SURVIVED IT (beating it in 7 days)!

    * YOUR "CURE" IS WORSE THAN THE DISEASE!

    (The proof is that when your body after vaxing LOSES its IMMUNE SYSTEM (see cytokines below in my ps) & MORE PEOPLE WOULD DIE in FLU SEASON (just starting now 10/2021) & THEY ARE NOW "right on schedule" per https://www.brighteon.com/6b1d70d0-d79d-4cdf-9385-d0a7726c46a1 [brighteon.com] )

    In fact, due to VARIANTS being produced by the vaxxinated? I'd say the VAX IS THE DISEASE (as it debilitates your immune system to ZERO efficacy eventually & YOU DIE...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Why fix something that's NOT BROKEN (your innate native immune system) UNTIL the vax damages your "killer T" cells proven just above (specifically T1 marker type that marks infestors via cytokines for leukocytes envelop & digestion removal (or possibly lymphocytes doing so also)) - especially vs. something that DOES NOT KILL YOU in 99++% of cases minus ANY OTHER "co-morbidities"? Additionally given that - WHY THE "BIG PUSH" to PUSH (like drug dealers do & in this case, "LEGAL" drug dealers) to put a vax in you that does NOT WORK as advertised in the 1st place?? LOOKUP Franc Zalewski and see EXACTLY why here https://www.brighteon.com/0ff2ee6a-413a-4e4e-b516-831eb394bc90 [brighteon.com] Where he shows SOMEKIND OF ORGANISM self-assembling made of carbon & aluminum floating around in VACCINATED FOLKS' BLOOD doing WHO KNOWS WHAT!... apk

(1)