Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Saturday November 13 2021, @06:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the You-don't-own-what-you-own dept.

Zero Motorcycles announced their groundbreaking new battery "technology", in which they sell you a large capacity battery in a motorcycle with powerful motors and advanced traction control systems, and then lock all that away behind a software paywall that you can unlock (for a fee) in their app.

https://newatlas.com/motorcycles/zero-motorcycles-2022-battery-paid-upgrades/

Zero is not the first vehicle company to do this sort of thing. Notably, Tesla sells vehicles with capabilities that can be unlocked via software "upgrades". This strategy is also common in the CNC machine tool industry; it's long frustrated machinists that they can buy a machine with all the hardware, but then have a sizable portion of memory, advanced motion smoothing, and other functions locked behind activation keys, which often cost several thousand dollars. In that industry at least, if you know the right people and have a machine with a common control, you can get what you need to unlock it through other sources.

I anticipate a similar approach in the vehicle market, which has long sold "tuner" chips and has a great deal of modding enthusiasts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIJiXNzpRMY


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 14 2021, @02:58PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 14 2021, @02:58PM (#1196078)

    Not at all, half of a successful business is marketing and that includes segmenting the market. Many a great product has died from poor marketing and many poor products have succeeded on marketing alone.

  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday November 14 2021, @08:45PM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Sunday November 14 2021, @08:45PM (#1196174) Journal

    In a healthy market, the competition would start with the same thing but lock out a little less capacity in order to gain sales. First company would be obliged to one-up them to remain competitive. A couple more iterations and the artificial limit is gone. One company or the other then deletes the added cost involved in even making the limit possible in order to cut marginal production cost and lowers the retail price slightly.

    That's how healthy markets are supposed to work. It's a cornerstone of the argument in favor of Capitalism.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 2021, @02:39AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 2021, @02:39AM (#1196242)

      > In a healthy market, ...

      Nice fantasy. What often happens--in my experience--is that competitors make something that looks like the original, but is cheaper made or otherwise not as nice/good. Because the copy is priced lower, it forces the original out of the market. Quality becomes a race to the bottom. This is one reason why, 'We can't have nice things..'

      A wise friend said, "Everything good goes out of the market."

      My corollary: If I see something nicely made that I want, I don't wait, I buy it now (and even a spare, depending on the predicted product life). That way I lock in the quality of the original, and I can enjoy my nice thing.

      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday November 15 2021, @03:51AM

        by sjames (2882) on Monday November 15 2021, @03:51AM (#1196266) Journal

        It is a nice fantasy. I'm not so sure that I'll likely find a healthy market (according to the theory) sooner than I'll find a living unicorn. Smith believed that with judicious regulation, the market might approach healthy. The "Free Market" crowd are complete nutters. Even Smith didn't believe that could work.

        It's also notable that Smith's musings on the subject assumed MANY sellers with economic power close to the buyers (within an order of magnitude or so), not manufacturers with a net worth of billions selling to consumers with a net worth under a million. Of course he also warned that corporate charters should be granted extremely sparingly and that the chartered corporations should be kept on a very short leash and required to stay within their specific charter.