Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Journal by DannyB

Largest U.S. Bank Cuts Ties to Conservative Group, Canceling Donald Trump Jr. Event

The country's largest bank has cut ties with a Missouri conservative group, forcing an event that had been set to feature Donald Trump Jr. to be immediately canceled.

[....] Defense of Liberty founder Paul Curtman, a former GOP state representative, told the Missouri Independent that WePay informed him in a message that it would no longer do business with his group based on an alleged violation of terms of service and had refunded $30,000 in payments already processed for the event.

"It seems you're using WePay Payments for one or more of the activities prohibited by our terms of service," the message reportedly states. "More specifically: Per our terms of service, we are unable to process for hate, violence, racial intolerance, terrorism, the financial exploitation of a crime, or items or activities that encourage, promote, facilitate, or instruct others regarding the same."

Maybe Trump Jr and Defense of Liberty political action committee should not promote such things?

Or . . . maybe those things are their core message, and appeal to their base.

 

Reply to: Re:Interesting question on discrimination

    (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 19 2021, @05:02PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 19 2021, @05:02PM (#1197757)

    Yes, Congress or the courts can address this question, and probably will right after they address pressing questions about whose hair looks most gorgeously coiffed on 4K TV.

    Right now we have a perfect example: someone is pushed out of banking services for no reason of malfeasance, but a sort of scattershot laundry-list of things including "reputational risk" which is the corporate way of saying: "Your cooties may rub off on us!" This is why we establish principles. If equality before the law is to mean anything, then discrimination in services on the grounds of differences must be outlawed. If civil liberties are to mean anything, then discrimination on the basis of exercising them is ...

    ... apparently just peachy, today.

    On the other hand, if freedom of association is the ruling concern, including in public transactions, then we can go back to lunch counters for white people, and for everybody else.

Post Comment

Edit Comment You are not logged in. You can log in now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account, or post as Anonymous Coward.

Public Terminal

Anonymous Coward [ Create an Account ]

Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!


Logged-in users aren't forced to preview their comments. Create an Account!

Allowed HTML
<b|i|p|br|a|ol|ul|li|dl|dt|dd|em|strong|tt|blockquote|div|ecode|quote|sup|sub|abbr|sarc|sarcasm|user|spoiler|del>

URLs
<URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL

Important Stuff

  • Please try to keep posts on topic.
  • Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
  • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
  • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
  • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
  • If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please yell for help.