SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Largest U.S. Bank Cuts Ties to Conservative Group, Canceling Donald Trump Jr. Event
The country's largest bank has cut ties with a Missouri conservative group, forcing an event that had been set to feature Donald Trump Jr. to be immediately canceled.
[....] Defense of Liberty founder Paul Curtman, a former GOP state representative, told the Missouri Independent that WePay informed him in a message that it would no longer do business with his group based on an alleged violation of terms of service and had refunded $30,000 in payments already processed for the event.
"It seems you're using WePay Payments for one or more of the activities prohibited by our terms of service," the message reportedly states. "More specifically: Per our terms of service, we are unable to process for hate, violence, racial intolerance, terrorism, the financial exploitation of a crime, or items or activities that encourage, promote, facilitate, or instruct others regarding the same."
Maybe Trump Jr and Defense of Liberty political action committee should not promote such things?
Or . . . maybe those things are their core message, and appeal to their base.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday November 19 2021, @01:40PM (9 children)
Yes. It's not their business. For the previous post, where does Wikileaks fall on that list? Once you have the tools to suspend someone for fantasy and ambiguous crimes like "hate" and "racial intolerance", you have the tools to suppress someone for being inconvenient to the state.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 19 2021, @06:22PM (3 children)
BAKE THE CAKE!
BAKE THE CAKE!
BAKE THE CAKE!
KAPERNICK IS A HERO!
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday November 19 2021, @10:15PM (2 children)
Nailed it in one Mr. Garibaldi.
Any company should be forced to do things or serve customers it does not like, if I like those things.
Any company should never be forced to do things or serve customers it does not like, if I don't like those things.
Totally typical of Republicans. Every single time.
They can never put themselves in someone else's shoos. Or see things from someone else's perspective. The rules are fluid depending on whether I like it or not.
Same for Big Tech and censorship:
* Big Tech should not be able to censor views of parties I happen to like, even if they spread misinformation and lies
* Web sites like Parler, Gab, etc, should not be forced to host radical left wing content based on reality and facts
If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday November 20 2021, @02:06AM (1 child)
A bakery is not a bank. Don't know what your shtick is here, but you're not answering relevant questions or acknowledging the flaws in your argument. We cannot allow basic services to be discriminatory or administered politically in any way.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 20 2021, @10:41PM
That is an often misunderstood ruling. By law the bakery was required to sell any advertised* cake to anyone who paid the advertised price. What they didn't have to do was personalized decorations, because custom work is explicitly exempt in that law. That same law is supposed to apply to every business that sells goods or services to the public. As banks advertise and sell financial services to the public they shouldn't be allowed to play favourites. If you pay the listed fees then you should receive the listed services.
*This includes any display item in the store.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 20 2021, @02:41AM (4 children)
Do you know what "stealthing" is? It's removing a condom during sex without informing your partner. Assange pulled this shit at least twice, and many countries consider this to be non-consensual sex, making him a rapist. He kind of lost sympathy with many who followed his actions.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 20 2021, @04:34AM
That was the claim, and never actually proven. It was treated as the foundation of a charge that was ostensibly politically motivated, and apparently on very shaky grounds.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday November 20 2021, @04:38AM (2 children)
Red herring. That had nothing to do with the funding of Wikileaks, even if it were true. Banks are just as justified pulling your banking services for that as they are Wikileaks.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 20 2021, @08:13PM (1 child)
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday November 21 2021, @04:35AM
You didn't make that point earlier. But if you had, I would have noted that Wikileaks was based [wikipedia.org] in Iceland, and that one of their primary payment processors was also in Iceland (and lost [wired.com] a court case concerning that boycott).
Notice the phrase "violated contract laws". When these payment processors make a contract with Wikileaks, they make a contract which remains enforceable even if the other party is not a resident. But most of the parties involved, including Wikileaks, have residence in multiple countries and hence, that excuse doesn't fly. A typical approach is for a local office to make a contract with the local office of the other party.