Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Sunday November 21 2021, @06:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-many-products-built-with-these-will-actually-get-recalled? dept.

Malware downloaded from PyPI 41,000 times was surprisingly stealthy:

PyPI—the open source repository that both large and small organizations use to download code libraries—was hosting 11 malicious packages that were downloaded more than 41,000 times in one of the latest reported such incidents threatening the software supply chain.

JFrog, a security firm that monitors PyPI and other repositories for malware, said the packages are notable for the lengths its developers took to camouflage their malicious code from network detection. Those lengths include a novel mechanism that uses what's known as a reverse shell to proxy communications with control servers through the Fastly content distribution network. Another technique is DNS tunneling, something that JFrog said it had never seen before in malicious software uploaded to PyPI.

"Package managers are a growing and powerful vector for the unintentional installation of malicious code, and as we discovered with these 11 new PyPI packages, attackers are getting more sophisticated in their approach, Shachar Menashe, senior director of JFrog research, wrote in an email. "The advanced evasion techniques used in these malware packages, such as novel exfiltration or even DNS tunneling (the first we've seen in packages uploaded to PyPI) signal a disturbing trend that attackers are becoming stealthier in their attacks on open source software."

The researchers said that PyPI quickly removed all malicious packages once JFrog reported them.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 22 2021, @02:41AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 22 2021, @02:41AM (#1198486)

    Seems like the many eyes worked here. You had enough of the right eyes looking for these sorts of "bugs" and they ended up finding them.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 22 2021, @08:56AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 22 2021, @08:56AM (#1198535)
    41,000 downloads - so how many projects used this crappy code and shipped products with spyware? We don't know, and we don't know what has been compromised as a result. So the digging has to continue. Will it?