Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday December 02 2021, @03:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the liberty-or-death dept.

Judge blocks Biden vaccine rule, citing “liberty interests of the unvaccinated”

A federal judge yesterday blocked a Biden administration COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers, granting a request for preliminary injunction filed by Republican attorneys general from 14 states.

US District Judge Terry Doughty ruled that the government lacks authority to implement the rule that "requires the staff of twenty-one types of Medicare and Medicaid healthcare providers to receive one vaccine by December 6, 2021, and to receive the second vaccine by January 4, 2022." Providers that don't comply face penalties, including "termination of the Medicare/Medicaid Provider Agreement."

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate regulates over 10.3 million health care workers in the US, of which 2.4 million are unvaccinated. The Biden vaccine rule is being challenged by the attorneys general from Louisiana, Montana, Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio. The Republican AGs' lawsuit was filed against CMS and the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The preliminary injunction they won applies nationwide except for 10 states that "are already under a preliminary injunction order dated November 29, 2021, issued by the Eastern District of Missouri," a court order said. Those states are Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nebraska, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

What states did not participate in this lawsuit and were not covered by the earlier preliminary injunction — i.e. got swept into this decision?

California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District Of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @02:55AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @02:55AM (#1201722)

    You sign a release when you get your health insurance that allows them to contact your medical providers and the state to verify certain health information already and you sign releases with your providers that they can share the information with your insurance. Also they can verify prexisting conditions, they just cannot discriminate based on them, which doesn't really matter since vaccination status for any vaccine isn't a medical condition under the ACA or administrative rules.

  • (Score: 2) by legont on Friday December 03 2021, @05:03AM

    by legont (4179) on Friday December 03 2021, @05:03AM (#1201742)

    In Russia an antivaxxer just bribes $100 to the nurse and she shots the can instead of him. About 10% of vaccinated are like this.
    How do they know? Well, when an antivaxxer ends up in a hospital, the treatment for Covid is actually quite different for vaccinated and unvaccinated folks. Like live or die different. So Russians developed a test to check if a patient was actually vaccinated to make sure she is not lying.
    That was all in the name of saving lives, but lately they introduced harsh punishments for such people. They do have to recover costs somehow, right?

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.