Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday December 03 2021, @05:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-larger-they-are... dept.

FTC Crashes NVIDIA's Party by Suing to Block its $40 Billion Deal To Acquire Arm Holdings

NVIDIA is now facing the most stringent test yet to its planned acquisition of the chip designer Arm Holdings.

To wit, the US FTC is now suing NVIDIA to block the $40 billion deal. FTC Bureau of Competition Director, Holly Vedova, said in a statement:

"The FTC is suing to block the largest semiconductor chip merger in history to prevent a chip conglomerate from stifling the innovation pipeline for next-generation technologies."

Vedova went on to note:

"Tomorrow's technologies depend on preserving today's competitive, cutting-edge chip markets. This proposed deal would distort Arm's incentives in chip markets and allow the combined firm to unfairly undermine Nvidia's rivals."

FTC press release.

Also at NYT, The Verge, and Reuters.

Previously;
Nvidia's $40 Billion ARM Acquisition: "All but Dead"?
European Commission Extends Probe of Nvidia's Arm Acquisition


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday December 03 2021, @11:22AM (3 children)

    by TheRaven (270) on Friday December 03 2021, @11:22AM (#1201792) Journal
    Arm Ltd. is the correct spelling of the company that was known as ARM Holdings PLC prior to the SoftBank acquisition. NVIDIA is the correct capitalisation of the company as used on all of their corporate filings, nVidia is used by some NVIDIA marketing and their investor page [nvidia.com], I've not noticed nVIDIA but it's probably used in some places too. Arm Ltd. is a British limited liability company (i.e. privately traded) with a singly shareholder, which is a Japanese company. Arm produces two things (well, more, but the two most important are):
    • A specification of an architecture (ISA and related things like the interrupt controller, system MMU, and so on) along with a conformance test suite and compliance certification.
    • IP cores that third parties can license that implement this specification.

    Quite a few companies build SoCs using Arm's cores. Others use the specifications and certification to build compatible chips. The latter category includes Qualcomm, Apple, NVIDIA, and so on. Arm carefully maintains their neutrality and independence: all of their partners can contribute to the architecture design, Arm builds a consensus, and then provides reference implementations. They do not favour their own cores over third-party ones and they allow other companies to license the cores that they design implementing the specification. That also allow a very mix-and-match approach, you can use Arm's CPU cores with your own GPU, Arm's Mali GPU with your own CPU core, and so on. The concern with the acquisition is that NVIDIA would privilege their own cores and the combination of their GPU and CPU cores, restricting competition.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday December 03 2021, @11:45AM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday December 03 2021, @11:45AM (#1201795)

    I have lost track, is Softbank still holding Arm?

    Historical note, I bought into Softbank stock shortly after the Arm acquisition. Even with a Trump endorsement following soon after my purchase, it didn't jump high enough to fund an early retirement. It is actually quite amazing how insignificant Arm seems to be to the Softbank bottom line.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday December 03 2021, @01:52PM

      by TheRaven (270) on Friday December 03 2021, @01:52PM (#1201804) Journal
      Arm is an infrastructure company according to Bill Gates' definition, which means that the overwhelming majority of the money in the ecosystem is made by other companies. Apple alone makes far more money from the Arm ecosystem than Arm does. This is part of their value (to the world, and in particular to their partners, not to their shareholders): they are small and independent. SoftBank, from what I can tell, didn't really understand this and thought that owning Arm would increase the value of the other bits of the Arm ecosystem that they owned. They also thought that Arm should be able to capitalise more on their core position in the ecosystem, not realising that any attempt by Arm to do that would destroy the value of Arm in that ecosystem.
      --
      sudo mod me up
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Friday December 03 2021, @04:54PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday December 03 2021, @04:54PM (#1201851) Journal

      Notice that the $40 billion Nvidia offered to buy Arm is not much more than the $31 billion SoftBank paid.

      There is no good reason for Nvidia to buy Arm unless they plan to screw over the other licensees. Theoretically they could get a leg up on custom Arm CPU designs, but they can probably do that without an acquisition, just like Apple has.

      RISC-V is waiting in the wings in case Arm is FUBAR, but it is a short-term hassle to switch to RISC-V. So most of the Arm licensees are bitterly opposed to the acquisition attempt.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]