Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by DannyB

JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla) (Entered: 12/02/2021)

Plaintiffs initiated this action on November 25, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Their claims were subsequently dismissed either voluntarily (ECF Nos. 86-91) or by leave of Court (ECF No. 149). Defendants and the Intervenor-Defendants filed motions for sanctions. On August 25, 2021, the Court granted the motions filed by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the City of Detroit and granted in part and denied in part the motion filed by Robert Davis. (ECF No. 172.) The sanctions awarded included the reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by Governor Whitmer, Secretary of State Benson, and the City of Detroit. The Court decided on the amount of the fee awards in an Opinion and Order entered today.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ counsel, jointly and severally, shall pay attorneys’ fees in the amount of $21,964.75 to Defendants Gretchen Whitmer and Jocelyn Benson;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ counsel, jointly and severally, shall pay attorneys’ fees in the amount of $153,285.62 to Intervenor-Defendant City of Detroit;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: December 2, 2021

The public and other individuals should not have to pay for the costs of this election fraud nonsense which has no evidence nor any basis in fact. If it did, they would have shown some.

(oh, but Mike Lindell . . . yeah, right.)

See also:

Two lawyers challenging election results must pay $187K

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @04:03PM (12 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @04:03PM (#1201833)

    Libruls approve of librul judge's ruling favoring librul politicians. News at 11:00!!

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @04:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @04:22PM (#1201838)

      Morons commit treason over provably false election lies. Morons likely to howl at moon, more on this as the story develops.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday December 03 2021, @04:49PM

      by DannyB (5839) on Friday December 03 2021, @04:49PM (#1201849) Journal

      The judge was fair. It is all out in the open. If they had any actual evidence they should have actually presented it. Woah! What an idea! If they think the judge and/or trial was unfair, biased, etc that is one of the reasons you can appeal. Because the trial was unfair. (You don't get to appeal because you don't like the outcome, only because there was something wrong with the process of how the outcome was arrived at.)

      It seems pretty fair that if you have zero evidence of election fraud, and are filing a suit merely for publicity purposes, that you should not only lose, but you should have to pay the defendant's costs in defending from this farsical nonsense.

      I keep hearing that there is some evidence that Trump won the election. I have yet to see any. Some grand conspiracy. Voting machine rigging by dead dictators. Bamboo. And all sorts of other outlandish claims.

      --
      If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:53PM (9 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:53PM (#1201901)

      No idea whether she is a democrat loyalist or not. This order is just a fixing of attorney costs for a matter that was closed previously, and should be non-political.

      Perhaps our local DNC rep can provide PDFs of the actual meat and potatoes of this case. Was it related to the Republican observers being barred from observing the counting of the votes? The boarding up of windows to prevent any observation of what was going on?

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday December 03 2021, @08:07PM (8 children)

        by DannyB (5839) on Friday December 03 2021, @08:07PM (#1201939) Journal

        Can you not find out for yourself? Lick the clink that I provided above [courtlistener.com] in TFA. Select and copy the case number. 20-13134 Now use this magical tool called Google.

        Find this. Civil Case No. 20-13134 [uscourts.gov] That is 36 pages of explanation. Here is some of it.

        The right to vote is among the most sacred rights of our democracy and, in turn, uniquely defines us as Americans. The struggle to achieve the right to vote is one that has been both hard fought and cherished throughout our country’s history. Local, state, and federal elections give voice to this right through the ballot. And elections that count each vote celebrate and secure this cherished right.

        These principles are the bedrock of American democracy and are widely revered as being woven into the fabric of this country. In Michigan, more than 5.5 million citizens exercised the franchise either in person or by absentee ballot during the 2020 General Election. Those votes were counted and, as of November 23, 2020, certified by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers (also “State Board”). The Governor has sent the slate of Presidential Electors to the Archivist of the United States to confirm the votes for the successful candidate.

        Against this backdrop, Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit, bringing forth claims of widespread voter irregularities and fraud in the processing and tabulation of votes and absentee ballots. They seek relief that is stunning in its scope and breathtaking in its reach. If granted, the relief would disenfranchise the votes of the more than 5.5 million Michigan citizens who, with dignity, hope, and a promise of a voice, participated in the 2020 General Election. The Court declines to grant Plaintiffs
        this relief.

        That is just the first page. The next pages go into greater detail. This is all out in the open. Not hidden under a rock or in some back room somewhere.

        Now was that so difficult?

        --
        If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
        • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @08:15PM (7 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @08:15PM (#1201947)

          That doesn't answer the question

          Were observers barred and the shades pulled? The count room should be full of cameras and broadcast on the internet at least. Without transparency fraud must be assumed.

          • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday December 03 2021, @09:04PM (3 children)

            by DannyB (5839) on Friday December 03 2021, @09:04PM (#1201962) Journal

            If your question is not part of the lawsuit, then it is irrelevant to the lawsuit.

            The court room is always recorded by a court recorder and a transcript is created. Many (most?) modern court rooms also keep an audio record in addition to (or instead of?) a court reporter.

            Some courts allow cameras. (Just see YouTube as an example of videos taken by permission of the court.)

            Courts try to be transparent.

            What are you complaining about? Other than you don't like the outcome because the plaintiffs didn't even try to prove their case because their lawsuit was for the purpose of publicity.

            --
            If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @10:47PM (2 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @10:47PM (#1201986)

              Heh, very funny, but not the court room, the count room, where votes are counted. Full transparency is required, cameras, microphones, every bit of spy equipment you can think of, big windows to let people see inside.

              • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday December 06 2021, @03:55PM (1 child)

                by DannyB (5839) on Monday December 06 2021, @03:55PM (#1202518) Journal

                If that is your question, then it should have been part of the lawsuit complaint. With supporting evidence.

                It's funny how all these conspiracy theories are NEVER backed up by actual evidence. Just loud strong assertions that it is true.

                --
                If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @10:00PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @10:00PM (#1202594)

                  No, not an assertion, it was a question that you still haven't answered. I don't care about the lawsuits. Did it happen or not? Were the shades pulled? If you don't know, just say it without the pontificating

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @10:30PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @10:30PM (#1201978)

            They were, we all saw the pictures. But this lawsuit didn't go into that. From what I gather here, it was a federal suit that attempted to halt the submission of the state results. Our DNC rep provided an injunction denial that basically said "filed too late", and that the 11th amendment restricts citizens' suits in federal court against a state.

            No idea whether there are state efforts still ongoing to enforce transparency in the future.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @07:26PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @07:26PM (#1202560)

              "The pictures"?

              Citations please. Last I heard there were some photos of ballots in a ditch and some other sketchy pics that were misleading, all debunked and the ditch photos were actually done by some Republican asshole trying to fabricate the evidence. We continue to see actual evidence of extremist conservatives trying to cheat elections, and all the evidence they claim to have always seems to disappear in a puff of fakery and bullshit.

              PLEASE if you have credible evidence SHARE IT! So far on this site all we've gotten are sketchy images attached to opinion pieces with lots of emotionally scary language.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @09:56PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06 2021, @09:56PM (#1202593)

            Troll

            As usual, the dems don't want to ask the right questions. They just want to pad their numbers any way they can

  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Friday December 03 2021, @05:53PM (6 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Friday December 03 2021, @05:53PM (#1201876) Journal

    Anybody placing bets?

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday December 03 2021, @06:40PM (5 children)

      by DannyB (5839) on Friday December 03 2021, @06:40PM (#1201896) Journal

      The defendants who were wrongfully sued can petition the court for an Order of Replevin. (Google that phrase.) (remembering back to Groklaw daze here.)

      A writ of replevin is a prejudgment process ordering the seizure or attachment of alleged illegally taken or wrongfully withheld property to be held in the U.S. Marshal's custody or that of another designated official, under order and supervision of the court, until the court determines otherwise.

      The U.S. Marshal can come and seize whatever property is necessary to ensure the judgement is paid. If it comes to that, it would be fun to watch these clowns get raided. Not only do they make false claims of election fraud without any evidence or basis in fact, but they also think they are above the law and not subject to court judgements. If that happens, I want a front row seat.

      --
      If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
      • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday December 04 2021, @01:19AM (1 child)

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday December 04 2021, @01:19AM (#1202019) Journal

        If that happens, then the matter will be closed

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @01:54AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @01:54AM (#1202024)

          Lookit mr armchair lawyer over here spittin dem hot takes!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @10:44AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @10:44AM (#1202079)

        If they really don't want to pay up, it is easier to just serve every bank, investment firm, credit union, etc. you can think of to garnish their debts owed to the loser so they have to give them to the winners instead.

        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday December 06 2021, @03:29PM (1 child)

          by DannyB (5839) on Monday December 06 2021, @03:29PM (#1202508) Journal

          Doing what you suggest as well as an Order of Replevin are not mutually exclusive options.

          Somehow, I think the US justice system has figured out how to collect judgements from rich deadbeats.

          --
          If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 07 2021, @01:57AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 07 2021, @01:57AM (#1202625)

            They are. Replevin isn't what you think it is.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:08PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:08PM (#1201881)

    It is lovely seeing the lack of rightwing shitposts for the most part. Guess the Big Lie actually does give them some embarassment. Probably gonna be too much for them to admit the insurrection was a mistake.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:29PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @06:29PM (#1201891)

      Uh oh, triggered one of them! Abort abort got an offended domestic terrorist!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @11:12PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 03 2021, @11:12PM (#1201992)

        Stop it Runaway, you're kraken us up.

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @05:33PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04 2021, @05:33PM (#1202145)

        Since the comment seems to be getting traction, it referred to the downmodder of the OP. You can tell bt the use of "domestic terrorist" which is a Republican hobby these days.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by DannyB on Friday December 03 2021, @07:21PM

    by DannyB (5839) on Friday December 03 2021, @07:21PM (#1201907) Journal

    Revealed: how Sidney Powell could be disbarred for lying in court for Trump [theguardian.com]

    The former lawyer filed cases across America for the former president, hoping to overturn the results of the 2020 election

    Sidney Powell, the former lawyer for Donald Trump who filed lawsuits across the US for the former president, hoping to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, has on several occasions represented to federal courts that people were co-counsel or plaintiffs in her cases without seeking their permission to do so, the Guardian has learned.

    Some of these individuals say that they found out that Powell had named them only once the cases were already filed.

    [....] Powell’s naming of other people as plaintiffs or co-counsel without their consent and representing that other attorneys were central to her cases when, in fact, their roles were nominal or nonexistent, constitute serious potential violations of the American Bar Association model rules for professional conduct [...]

    Powell’s misrepresentations to the courts in those particular instances often aided fundraising for her non-profit, Defending the Republic. Powell had told prospective donors that the attorneys were integral members of an “elite strike force” who had played outsized roles in her cases – when in fact they were barely involved if at all.

    [....] The State Bar of Texas is already investigating Powell for making other allegedly false and misleading statements to federal courts by propagating increasingly implausible conspiracy theories to federal courts that Joe Biden’s election as president of the United States was illegitimate.

    The Texas bar held its first closed-door hearing regarding the allegations about Powell on 4 November.

    [....] Among those who have alleged that Powell falsely named them as co-counsel is attorney Linn Wood, [....] The Michigan case was a futile attempt by Powell to erase Joe Biden’s victory in that state and name Trump as the winner. On 25 August, federal district court Judge Linda Parker, of Michigan, sanctioned Powell and nine other attorneys who worked with her for having engaged in “a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process” in bringing the case in the first place. Powell’s claims of election fraud, Parker asserted, had no basis in law and were solely based on “speculation, conjecture, and unwarranted suspicion”.

    Parker further concluded that the conduct of Powell, Wood, and the eight other attorneys whom they worked with, warranted a “referral for investigation and possible suspension or disbarment to the appropriate disciplinary authority for each state … in which each attorney is admitted”.

    See also:

    More lawyers sanctioned trying to overthrow election [soylentnews.org]

    where I quoted . . .

    A federal judge in Michigan has denied a lawsuit seeking to decertify the state’s Nov. 3, 2020 General Election results based on claims of widespread fraud in the distribution, collection, and counting of ballots.

    There has been no evidence of such fraud in Michigan’s election. The election results were certified in Michigan on Nov. 23. [clickondetroit.com]

    Related: AG Barr: No evidence of voter fraud that’d change election outcome [clickondetroit.com]

    In her opinion, Judge Linda V. Parker, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, called the plaintiffs’ request “stunning in its scope and breathtaking in its reach.”

    “Plaintiffs ask this Court to ignore the orderly statutory scheme established to challenge elections and to ignore the will of millions of voters. This, the Court cannot, and will not, do. The People have spoken,” reads Parker’s opinion.

    --
    If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
(1)