Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday December 21 2021, @11:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the cost-plus-contracting-the-spice-must-flow dept.

Rich Smith at The Motley Fool opines that NASA's SLS Rocket Just Got $3.2 Billion More Expensive:

How much is too much to pay for an SLS rocket? And how much is so much that it gets SLS canceled?

At an estimated $1.55 billion in cost per launch, and $209 billion total over its 30-year history, the U.S. Space Shuttle program was easily NASA's most expensive project since the Apollo Moon Program -- but NASA's next project is going to make it look like a bargain. Two years ago, an investigation by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) estimated that each time NASA launches its new Space Launch System (SLS), taxpayers will ante up "over $2 billion."

As it turns out, OMB was being optimistic.

[...] Last week, NASA awarded one of its main subcontractors on the SLS project, Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC), a $3.2 billion contract to build booster rockets for five SLS rockets that will participate in the Project Artemis moon program.

[...] These boosters are essential to the Artemis program, providing "more than 75% of the thrust for each SLS launch," as NASA explains, but they do come at a cost. Specifically, each rocket booster will cost taxpayers -- and benefit Northrop Grumman -- more than $290 million.

[...] For the cost of just one Northrop Grumman booster rocket (which will be discarded after launch), NASA could buy two entire SpaceX rocketships. For what Northrop is charging to help launch one single SLS, NASA could launch four Falcon Heavy missions.

Your tax dollars at work. Also: Re-usable shuttle engines on an expendable launcher.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday December 22 2021, @05:40PM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 22 2021, @05:40PM (#1207149) Homepage Journal

    I won't even attempt to argue that Musk isn't scamming the government. Musk does one mission for the government, and the profits pay for a private mission, or maybe even a bit more than 1 private mission. Pretty sweet scam - I wish I could get in on that.

    But, as Khallow points out, Musk actually does perform missions for the government. SLS has never done a mission. Not one mission completed. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

    Now, take all of the space exploration and research entities around the world, and start tallying up all their missions, failed or successful. Then rank them in order of goods and services provided, per dollar. I'm too lazy to actually do the math and research, but I'll bet SpaceX ranks in the top 25%. They are likely higher than that, but I'm unwilling to make that assertion before doing at least minimal research. I'll bet a subscription to SN on that. If I'm wrong, I pay a subscription in the name of any person you designate, if I'm right, you pay a one year subscription for some poor unfortunate individual who isn't subscribed already. Want to take that bet?

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 23 2021, @07:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 23 2021, @07:30PM (#1207467)

    What do you have against poor unfortunates?