A rocket science safety expert on Sunday said Virgin Galactic "ignored" safety warnings in the years leading up to the deadly crash of its spacecraft in California, as investigators hunted for clues to accident's cause.
Carolynne Campbell, a rocket propulsion expert with the Netherlands-based International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety, said she could not speculate on the cause of Friday's crash without "all the data." However, she said multiple warnings had been issued to Virgin since 2007, when three engineers died testing a rocket on the ground.
http://news.yahoo.com/probe-virgin-spaceship-crash-may-085338983.html
(Score: 2) by VLM on Monday November 03 2014, @12:36PM
I had the same thought as yours although I'd adjust the phrase from
specific and important
To
specific and important and relevant
For example several people are commenting on the incident where a bunch of people were hurt / killed in a stereotypical compressed gas accident during some ground testing where AFAIK the ground testing gear explosively failed.
Going all SN automotive analogy, just because someone blew up an air compressor while filling their car tires doesn't imply they "must have repeated" ignored the bomb strapped to the ignition switch.