SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the By-the-inch,-it's-a-cinch-but-a-mile-takes-a-while dept.
We've previously discussed ( https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=21/12/11/1847236 ) how it becomes impossible to reverse the polarization of a community once their differences become too great, and how that plays out both here at SN and in the wider world. Science Blog has a piece ( https://scienceblog.com/527745/computer-model-seeks-to-explain-the-spread-of-misinformation-and-suggest-counter-measures/ ) about a PLOS paper titled "Cognitive cascades: How to model (and potentially counter) the spread of fake news" ( https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261811 ) which uses an interesting computer model to explore how this actually happens.
The model demonstrated that if the new information is too much at odds with a person's existing belief, it will be ignored. Furthermore, if that belief is connected with the person's identity, their current belief will be strengthened as a defense against cognitive dissonance. Interestingly, though, a succession of new information that gradually nudge the person to adjust their beliefs can, over time, cause the person to adopt a belief that is very different from the one they started with. This sounds like how psy-ops manipulate targets to accept extreme views.
What was the gradual change of ideas that have led national political parties to be ever more different from one another, and who fed them those messages?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday January 16 2022, @06:07PM (8 children)
That wouldn't happen to be your contribution to this discussion?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 16 2022, @07:41PM (5 children)
Aren't you one of the ones saying the insurrection didn't happen? Truly a master of reality you are /s
(Score: 2, Troll) by khallow on Sunday January 16 2022, @07:50PM
Nope. I was instead saying that the riot in question was not an insurrection. The evidence supports me, such as a lack of action indicating lack of intent to commit insurrection (entered Capitol and milled around for a while), poorly armed for an insurrection when it would be easy to show up heavily armed (firearms instead of flagpoles and fire extinguishers, for example), and an absence of any planning of said insurrection.
(Score: 2, Touché) by khallow on Sunday January 16 2022, @07:52PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 16 2022, @10:32PM (2 children)
And thirdly, their firearms were taken to the riot in a truck, which means that it wasn't an attempted insurrection and attack against the Constitution.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday January 17 2022, @07:24AM (1 child)
But not carried or used in said riot. See a pattern there?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 17 2022, @04:26PM
They're too stupid to understand. Just too stupid. They've got their talking points from CNN, and they won't allow anything to distract them from chanting the mantra.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 17 2022, @06:32AM (1 child)
Do try to keep up, khallow! It is always a good thing to have idiots pointed out as such. Consider, Rand Paul! But I usually point out that Rogan, Jordan Peterson, and Newt Gingrich are what someone once pointed as "a stupid person's idea of a smart person". Second order Dunning-Kroger, I guess. But of a kind, as Trump is a stupid person's idea of a billionaire. "If he's so rich, why isn't he smart?" See where all this is going? Khallow?
(Score: 2, Touché) by khallow on Monday January 17 2022, @07:31AM
I'm glad my efforts are appreciated.
The real question: do you?