Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday January 18 2022, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the Pew!-Pew!-Pew! dept.

FedEx Asks Permission to Install Anti-Missile Lasers on Its Cargo Jet:

FedEx has asked the US Federal Aviation Administration if it could install anti-missile lasers on cargo jets, according to a request filed earlier this month. The FAA request is set to be published on the public register next week.

Heat-seeking missiles detect and target heat from cargo jet engines, and because these planes are less maneuverable that a fighter jet, they're hard to shake off. Gizmodo reports that anti-missile lasers act like a distraction, shining an infrared laser directly at the missile to disrupt its ability to track a heat signature.

Although it may seem out of left field, supply chain issues have been causing food and product shortages since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Last year, hackers even deployed ransomware attacks on a major agricultural services provider. With those cyberpunk logistics challenges in mind, FedEx's application makes a little more sense.

"In recent years, in several incidents abroad, civilian aircraft were fired upon by man-portable air defense systems," the application letter reads.

[...] When FedEx first tested similar equipment back in 2008, CBS reported the lasers were eye-safe. In addition, Gizmodo reports that the current application includes new features, reporting and important safety information for airline crew. The lasers really shouldn't pose a problem to civilians on the ground, then, and it makes us wonder — should all passenger planes have this tech?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 19 2022, @12:40AM (5 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday January 19 2022, @12:40AM (#1213735) Journal

    Hey, I *like* some articles of mens' clothing, okay? They're better built than what gets marketed to us and steel-toed workboots are awesome. That doesn't make me a cross-dresser, it makes me someone who likes durability in her clothes.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:01AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:01AM (#1213737)

    I can't blame you. How do so many women live without usable pockets?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @02:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @02:02AM (#1213746)

      They want you instead to wear a giant pocket called a "purse." Alternatively you can just have your boy toy carry stuff for you.

  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:18AM (1 child)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:18AM (#1213741)

    Marketed to us ... lesbians (is that right? I'm getting a weak neuron fire on that one), or us women? Seems like there's a huge market gap for women who want the functionality and durability of men's work clothes, but want a little more female-oriented, er, fit? Fashion? Not sure, but something that better matches women's needs/preferences.

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Wednesday January 19 2022, @02:43PM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Wednesday January 19 2022, @02:43PM (#1213844) Homepage Journal

      something that better matches women's needs/preferences

      More accurately, body shape. Women need room for hooters, but not for balls.

      --
      mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 19 2022, @01:30AM (#1213744)

    I never understood 'boy shoes'.

    Feet are just feet, right?

    (That and women have been conditioned to cripple themselves from a young age by walking in heels.)